2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2018.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility of an optimal EMG-driven adaptive impedance control applied to an active knee orthosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its features are summarised in Table 4. This equipment is used by a wide range of studies [39,40,41,42] because of its high accuracy and the powerful software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its features are summarised in Table 4. This equipment is used by a wide range of studies [39,40,41,42] because of its high accuracy and the powerful software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the sEMG based continuous-motion intention regression and sEMG-driven musculoskeletal model based motion intention recognition are rarely reviewed. And the two methods are more valuable to realize the smooth control of wearable robot movements [3,18,19]. In order to further understand the knowledge of the sEMG based motion intention recognition, this paper presents the review of all commonly used methods of human motion intention recognition for last decade briefly.…”
Section: Muscle Activationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For lower limb motion estimation, Pena et al [19] proposed a multilayer perceptron neural network to map the sEMG signals to the knee torque and stiffness. The input signals were the sEMG signals, knee angle, and angular velocities and the output signals were estimated knee torque and stiffness.…”
Section: Mapping Between Semg and Joint Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, patient's motion performance -effort, regularity, amplitude -evolution can be assessed more objectively by registering robot's sensors measurements, and assistance or resistance forces can be applied by its actuators, as needed, more precisely (KREBS et al, 2008;HOGAN, 2014;SHAHBAZI et al, 2016). Apart from the mechanical preadjustment possible for passive devices, those actively controlled can even have their software parameters customized in advance for each user's anthropometric and biological characteristics (JUTINICO et al, 2017;PÉREZ-IBARRA et al, 2019;PEÑA et al, 2019).…”
Section: Robotic Rehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, estimations of patient effort -used for both assistance and game challenge adaptation -which are dependent on additional equipment (DARZI; GORŠIČ; PEÑA et al, 2019) are less suitable for low-cost seeking applications of remote/home care (GORSIC;NOVAK, 2016;. It is desirable that this type of information could be obtained from very portable devices or directly from control data.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%