Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies 2009
DOI: 10.1145/1658939.1658951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility of content dissemination between devices in moving vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent work, Zahn et al [48] investigate the content dissemination for devices mounted on moving vehicles. However, there is very little work about whether it is feasible to support opportunistic communications on mobile phones.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent work, Zahn et al [48] investigate the content dissemination for devices mounted on moving vehicles. However, there is very little work about whether it is feasible to support opportunistic communications on mobile phones.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we believe that such type of event would not be as frequent as the event of a message being sent between two vehicles moving in the same direction, as only a few seconds, in fact, would be available for the discovery of a candidate relay and the successful transmission of an alert message to a vehicle that is traveling at a relative speed of 220 km/h, this case might as well occur. Interestingly, relevant previous work, which utilizes hardware settings that are very similar to ours, reveals the amount of data that can be exchanged between two vehicles that are moving in opposite directions on a highway [56]. The work that has been presented in the cited paper only focuses on the exchange of bulk data between two moving vehicles but can still be of interest to understand what contact time and what transfers of information can be achieved in such situation.…”
Section: F Have Our Experiments Been Realistic At Last?mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…We use 802.11a because it is closest to the frequency band (5.9 GHz) allocated for Intelligent Transport Systems in USA and Europe. Our laptops use a modified Atheros reference driver [24]. In broadcast mode, the modified driver allows us to change the broadcast data rate beyond the 802.11a default rate of 6 Mbps.…”
Section: Vehicular Testbedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent work proposed Broadside [24], a system that targets file exchange between two vehicles. Via real experiments, this work demonstrates the feasibility and efficiency of high-throughput file exchange among moving vehicles.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%