2014
DOI: 10.2514/1.62214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility of Guided Entry for a Crewed Lifting Body Without Angle-of-Attack Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where uref = [αref, σref] is the reference control variable. Note that to improve the accuracy of the predictor, the onboard estimation and correction method in [32] is employed in calculating the lift and drag accelerations.…”
Section: B Closed-loop Predictor For Terminal Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…where uref = [αref, σref] is the reference control variable. Note that to improve the accuracy of the predictor, the onboard estimation and correction method in [32] is employed in calculating the lift and drag accelerations.…”
Section: B Closed-loop Predictor For Terminal Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we want uncertainties in additional parameters, other than reentry states, to be considered, it is necessary to include them in the equations of motion and add their contribution to the evolution of the density in Eq. (5). For example, in the case under examination, we want to consider an uncertainty over the ballistic coefficient β and include the possibility of taking into account uncertainty in the atmospheric density (through an atmospheric correction coefficient ξ).…”
Section: Uncertainty Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of statistical analysis can be applied to several aspects of the re-entry problem. The design of crewed vehicles and their navigation algorithms can strongly benefit from an uncertainty analysis given the strict requirements on the sustainable loads and on the landing location [1][2][3][4][5]. The design of exploration probes and Presented as paper AAS 19-409 at the 29th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Ka'anapali, HI, 13 sample return missions can also gain from uncertainty quantification to improve the robustness of the mission [6][7][8] with the aim to increase the landing mass and precision and to provide more robust designs for the thermal protection and parachute deployment systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of their adaptive ability, flexibility, and wide applicability, numerical predictor-corrector entry guidance algorithms have in recent years become a primary choice for entry guidance. They have been extensively examined for skip entry missions [2][3][4][5][6] as well as direct entry for capsule vehicles [1,7] and lifting-body vehicles [1,[8][9][10][11][12]. Their potential applications in aerobraking and aerocapture missions have also shown great promise [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%