Feasibility of Invasive Grass Detection in a Desertscrub Community Using Hyperspectral Field Measurements and Landsat TM Imagery

Abstract

Abstract:Invasive species' phenologies often contrast with those of native species, representing opportunities for detection of invasive species with multi-temporal remote sensing. Detection is especially critical for ecosystem-transforming species that facilitate changes in disturbance regimes. The African C 4 grass, Pennisetum ciliare, is transforming ecosystems on three continents and a number of neotropical islands by introducing a grass-fire cycle. However, previous attempts at discriminating P. ciliare in North America using multi-spectral imagery have been unsuccessful. In this paper, we integrate field measurements of hyperspectral plant species signatures and canopy cover with multi-temporal spectral analysis to identify opportunities for detection using moderate-resolution multi-spectral imagery. By applying these results to Landsat TM imagery, we show that multi-spectral discrimination of P. ciliare in heterogeneous mixed desert scrub is feasible, but only at high abundance levels that may have limited value to land managers seeking to control invasion. Much higher discriminability is possible with hyperspectral shortwave infrared imagery because of differences in non-photosynthetic vegetation in uninvaded and invaded landscapes during dormant seasons but these spectra are unavailable in multispectral sensors. Therefore, we recommend hyperspectral imagery for distinguishing invasive grass-dominated landscapes from uninvaded desert scrub. OPEN ACCESSRemote Sens. 2011, 3 2284

Remote Distinction of A Noxious Weed (Musk Thistle: CarduusNutans) Using Airborne Hyperspectral Imagery and the Support Vector Machine Classifier

“…A wide range of sensor systems, including aerial photographs, airborne and satellite multispectral and hyperspectral images have been successfully utilized for mapping the distribution of certain species [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. A large number of investigators [37][38][39][40][41][42] have discussed the superiority of hyperspectral imaging sensors (also known imaging spectrometry), such as Airborne Imaging Spectroradiometer for Applications (AISA; Specim Inc., Oulu, Finland) over multispectral instruments, such as the Landsat Thematic Mapper.…”

Assessing the potential of remote sensing to discriminate invasive <i>Seriphium plumosum</i> from grass

“…Such conditions are best achieved at local noon time. This position permits attaining most of the reflected electromagnetic radiation (Cho et al 2008;Fernandes et al 2013;Mansour 2013;Olsson et al 2011;Rudolf et al 2015). However, not all measurements were taken using this protocol due to time constraint of the study that forced data acquisition outside of the ideal time.…”

EUROSPEC: at the interface between remote-sensing and ecosystem CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; flux measurements in Europe

“…The obvious advantage of hyperspectral sensors is that they can resolve more detailed features of the vegetation (Milton et al, 2009) and serve to estimate parameters that require higher spectral resolution, such as the emission of chlorophyll fluorescence (Meroni et al, 2009). Moreover, since hyperspectral information can be resampled to coarser spectral resolutions, data from hyperspectral systems can be flexibly convoluted to match spectral bands of different remote sensors (Olsson et al, 2011) increasing its value as a source of satellite calibration and validation data. In addition, hyperspectral data can be used to mine new spectral band combinations to match different ecosystem variables (e.g.…”