2015
DOI: 10.1007/s40870-015-0015-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility of Knots to Reduce the Maximum Dynamic Arresting Load in Rope Systems

Abstract: Impact loads to the human body due to falls from height can be mitigated by well-designed and characterized fall protection systems. While energy absorption methods using rope deformation and/or accessory components have previously been evaluated, the ability for simple knots tied in the system to alter impact loads has not been studied in detail. We quantify the effectiveness of various common knots to reduce dynamic loads in typical fall scenarios for which the systems are designed, and interpret this change… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these structural algorithms, the Figure Eight is more secure and stable than the Bowline, as Table 2 indicates. Further, each knots' ability to absorb energy and reduce impact forces is linked to its sinuosity, concatenation and crossing number (Martin et al, 2015;Sry et al, 2018). Energy absorption, of course, is related to the linear modulus of elasticity for ropes, so "elastic" knots are more important in rescue and rope-access contexts where low stretch or static lines are employed (Sry et al, 2018).…”
Section: Bowline and Figure Eightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these structural algorithms, the Figure Eight is more secure and stable than the Bowline, as Table 2 indicates. Further, each knots' ability to absorb energy and reduce impact forces is linked to its sinuosity, concatenation and crossing number (Martin et al, 2015;Sry et al, 2018). Energy absorption, of course, is related to the linear modulus of elasticity for ropes, so "elastic" knots are more important in rescue and rope-access contexts where low stretch or static lines are employed (Sry et al, 2018).…”
Section: Bowline and Figure Eightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strength has been the default test parameter. It may be more appropriate to explore structural security by also performing harmonic and nonharmonic excitation tests, dynamic arrest tests, and inertial loading to evaluate knots tied in materials exhibiting poor friction and knottability characteristics (Chisnall, 1995a(Chisnall, , 1995b(Chisnall, , 1995c(Chisnall, , 2020DailyDiamond, 2017;Evans, 2016;Martin et al, 2015;Moyer, 1999a;Weller et al, 2015). Clearly more research of a standardized nature is required.…”
Section: Testing Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following these considerations, the possibility of using a commercial polymeric element was investigated. Kevlar ropes with a 12 mm diameter and nominal resistance of 20 kN were tested, but crimping had the same problems found in the case of metal wires and making knots lead to a sharp (and difficult to foresee) reduction of the nominal resistance [27], eliminating in this way the advantage of the commercial component. In Figure 6, the effect of different types of knots on the quasistatic behavior of the rope is shown.…”
Section: Unconventional Design By Polymeric Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%