“…Assessment of PAVM patency after embolization is crucial because recanalization can occur in up to 50% of cases and cause neurologic events that are similar to those associated with untreated lesions ( 4 , 5 ). DSA remains the gold standard for identifying recanalization; however, in recent years, CT and MRA with or without contrast agents have been generally performed for the assessment of recanalization in embolized PAVMs because of their non-invasiveness ( 6 – 12 ). The detections of recanalization using unenhanced CT, contrast-enhanced CT, and TR-CEMRA have been reported to have sensitivities of 93%, 82%, and 93–100%, respectively, and specificities of 53%, 100%, and 93–100%, respectively ( 9 , 11 ).…”