2011
DOI: 10.1002/ajh.22268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility of outpatient consolidation chemotherapy in older versus younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
14
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The characteristics of the patients receiving ambulatory-based consolidation chemotherapy have been previously described [11], and are summarized in Table 1. There was no significant difference in the median age of patients between C1 and C2; 54.6% of patients in C1 and 52.3% in C2 were male and the proportion of patients age ≥ 60 was 30% in C1 and 33% in C2 (p=NS).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The characteristics of the patients receiving ambulatory-based consolidation chemotherapy have been previously described [11], and are summarized in Table 1. There was no significant difference in the median age of patients between C1 and C2; 54.6% of patients in C1 and 52.3% in C2 were male and the proportion of patients age ≥ 60 was 30% in C1 and 33% in C2 (p=NS).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eligibility requirements were as previously described [11]. Patients received the second consolidation cycle following peripheral count recovery from the first cycle and resolution of any previous bacterial infections.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many large academic institutions are currently managing a significant portion of their AML patients in the outpatient setting during post-remission therapy, an approach that has been found to be safe and feasible in pediatric patients as well as younger and older adults [1215,4951]. If encouraging results in the literature are to support an overall change in practice for patients following (re-)induction therapy, however, potential barriers to implementation at smaller academic and community practice hospitals need to be recognized and addressed.…”
Section: Barriers To Implementation Of Outpatient Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%