2018
DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.12762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility of re‐biopsy and EGFR mutation analysis in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer

Abstract: BackgroundIn cases of EGFR‐tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) failure, re‐biopsy may be useful to understand resistance mechanisms and guide further treatment decisions. However, performing re‐biopsy is challenging because of several hurdles. We assessed the feasibility of re‐biopsy in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in real‐world clinical practice.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the clinical and pathologic data of advanced NSCLC patients who experienced disease progression after previous … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
6
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…afatinib, erlotinib, geftinib, and osimertinib) will be greater than the total number who received EGFR-TKI c Of the 47 patients who received osimertinib as subsequent therapies, 24 were tested T790M positive, seven were not positive for T790M, and 16 were not tested for EGFR mutations d Other targeted therapeutic agents are listed in Table 1 therapy (including EGFR-TKIs) [20]. Furthermore, the 30% rate of EGFR testing before subsequent therapy is consistent with previous estimates (30-48%) [21][22][23] and emphasizes that, during the study period, a substantial proportion of patients initiated a subsequent therapy without updated information on the molecular profile of the tumor.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…afatinib, erlotinib, geftinib, and osimertinib) will be greater than the total number who received EGFR-TKI c Of the 47 patients who received osimertinib as subsequent therapies, 24 were tested T790M positive, seven were not positive for T790M, and 16 were not tested for EGFR mutations d Other targeted therapeutic agents are listed in Table 1 therapy (including EGFR-TKIs) [20]. Furthermore, the 30% rate of EGFR testing before subsequent therapy is consistent with previous estimates (30-48%) [21][22][23] and emphasizes that, during the study period, a substantial proportion of patients initiated a subsequent therapy without updated information on the molecular profile of the tumor.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…12,13 Notwithstanding re-biopsy is feasible in clinical practice, it is an invasive operation and faces the same challenges voiced by previous studies. 14,15 These defects enormously limit the practicability of precision medicine at scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the poor DNA quality, intratumoral heterogeneity and long turnaround time raise much concern on the balance of costs and benefits . Notwithstanding re‐biopsy is feasible in clinical practice, it is an invasive operation and faces the same challenges voiced by previous studies . These defects enormously limit the practicability of precision medicine at scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The continuous treatment using EGFR-TKI for EGFR-mutant NSCLC develops resistance to EGFR-TKIs, due to the acquired secondary EGFR mutations such as T790M on exon 20 of the EGFR gene [19,[24][25][26]. Re-biopsy is desirable for the early detection of tumor recurrence and proliferative reactivation of carcinoma by acquired drug resistance [19,27,28]. However, this is not practical because of the high invasiveness involved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%