2013
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.24507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility of reduced‐intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation with imatinib in children with philadelphia chromosome‐positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Abstract: Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph + ALL) in children is one of the highest-risk ALL groups. Improved outcome in combination with imatinib has been reported. However, intensive chemotherapy or myeloablative conditioning followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can be associated with significant adverse late effects. We report a case series of five children with Ph + ALL underwent reduced-intensity allogeneic HSCT (RIST) after induction and consolidation in chemo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, regarding methods to improve survival of Ph+ ALL patients, reduced intensity conditioning for transplant may be considered. A report on a small series of patients showed that non-myeloablative conditioning may be a valid option, with four out of five patients surviving disease-free [20]. Validity of reduced intensity conditioning becomes important when one considers the 5-year incidence of NRM of 17% in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Finally, regarding methods to improve survival of Ph+ ALL patients, reduced intensity conditioning for transplant may be considered. A report on a small series of patients showed that non-myeloablative conditioning may be a valid option, with four out of five patients surviving disease-free [20]. Validity of reduced intensity conditioning becomes important when one considers the 5-year incidence of NRM of 17% in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%