Feasibility of the Cognitive Assessment scale for Stroke Patients (CASP) vs. MMSE and MoCA in aphasic left hemispheric stroke patients

Barnay, José‐Luis; Wauquiez, Grégoire; Bonnin-Koang, Huei-Yune; Anquetil, Céline; Pérennou, Dominic; Piscicelli, Céline; Lucas-Pineau, B.; Muja, L.; Stunff, E. le; Boissezon, X. De; Terracol, C.; Rousseaux, M.; Béjot, Yannick; Binquet, Christine; Antoine, Daniel J.; Devilliers, H.; Benaïm, Charles

doi:10.1016/j.rehab.2014.05.010

Cited by 46 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In a previous work, we reported that: (1) its administration was better suited to patients with severe oral expression disorders and moderate comprehension disorders than the MMSE and MoCA and (2) its total score (outside of language items) was 50% less influenced by aphasia severity than those of the MMSE and MoCA [4]. The present work focused on a population of non-aphasic patients, 75% of them had a right-hemisphere stroke.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 73%

“…Several batteries of tests are used in clinical practice today, regardless of having been previously validated for that specific use. In a recent work [3,4], we reported the main assessments scales for cognitive disorders and demon- Introduction: CASP specifically assesses post-stroke cognitive impairments. Its items are visual and as such can be administered to patients with severe expressive aphasia.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As a matter of fact, the CASP was specifically designed, both in terms of content and format, for a quick evaluation of post-stroke cognitive disorders at ''the patient's bedside''. Its main characteristics consist in (see details in the primary publication by Barnay et al, [4]):…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Cognitive Assessment scale for Stroke Patients (CASP) vs. MMSE and MoCA in non-aphasic hemispheric stroke patients

Benaïm

Barnay

Wauquiez

et al. 2015

Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 73%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Cognitive Assessment scale for Stroke Patients (CASP) vs. MMSE and MoCA in non-aphasic hemispheric stroke patients

Benaïm

Barnay

Wauquiez

et al. 2015

Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…On the other hand, the MoCA is effective in detecting mild cognitive dysfunction, but it omits many items that assess executive function. Moreover, since both tests require verbal responses, if a patient has a language disorder, assessment of his or her orientation, recall, and memory will be difficult [ 7 8 9 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The CASP is more practicable for aphasic patients than other existing tests like the MMSE and the MoCA. With expressive aphasic patients, the total score and mean administration time were less influenced by aphasia severity compared to other tests [ 8 10 ]. In addition, the CASP includes multiple cognitive domains such as executive function, praxis, and neglect.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Korean Version of the Cognitive Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (K-CASP): A Reliability and Validity Study

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveTo develop the Korean version of the Cognitive Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (K-CASP) and to evaluate the test reliability and validity of the K-CASP in stroke patients.MethodsThe original CASP was translated into Korean, back-translated into English, then reviewed and compared with the original version. Thirty-three stroke patients were assessed independently by two examiners using the K-CASP twice, with a one-day interval, for a total of four test results. To evaluate the reliability of the K-CASP, intra-class correlation coefficients were used. Pearson correlations were calculated and simple regression analyses performed with the Korean version of Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) and the aphasia quotient (AQ) to assess the validity.ResultsThe mean score was 24.42±9.47 (total score 36) for the K-CASP and 21.50±7.01 (total score 30) for the K-MMSE. The inter-rater correlation coefficients of the K-CASP were 0.992 on the first day and 0.995 on the second day. The intra-rater correlation coefficients of the K-CASP were 0.997 for examiner 1 and 0.996 for examiner 2. In the Pearson correlation analysis, the K-CASP score significantly correlated with the K-MMSE score (r=0.825, p<0.001). The coefficients of determination (r2) of the AQ were 0.586 for the K-MMSE and 0.513 for the K-CASP in the simple regression analysis.ConclusionThe K-CASP is a reliable and valid instrument for cognitive dysfunction screening in post-stroke patients. It is more applicable than other cognitive assessment tools in stroke patients with aphasia.

show abstract

Have the patient's cognitive abilities been affected?

Pantoni

2019

Warlow's Stroke

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Feasibility of the Cognitive Assessment scale for Stroke Patients (CASP) vs. MMSE and MoCA in aphasic left hemispheric stroke patients

Cited by 46 publications

References 25 publications

The Cognitive Assessment scale for Stroke Patients (CASP) vs. MMSE and MoCA in non-aphasic hemispheric stroke patients

The Cognitive Assessment scale for Stroke Patients (CASP) vs. MMSE and MoCA in non-aphasic hemispheric stroke patients

The Korean Version of the Cognitive Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (K-CASP): A Reliability and Validity Study

Have the patient's cognitive abilities been affected?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About