2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility of using rural waste products to increase the denitrification efficiency in a surface flow constructed wetland

Abstract: A surface flow constructed wetland (CW) was set in the Lerma gully to decrease nitrate (NO3 -) pollution from agricultural runoff water. The water flow rate and NO3concentration were monitored at the inlet and the outlet, and sampling campaigns were performed which consisted of collecting six water samples along the CW flow line. After two years of operation, the NO3attenuation was limited at a flow rate of ~2.5 L/s and became negligible at ~5.5 L/s. The present work aimed to assess the feasibility of using ru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Limited NO 3 removal in the case of B-V might show larger fractionation (i.e., more negative 15 ε) values consistent with Mariotti et al (1988), who proposed that larger fractionation is expected for a lower denitrification rate. The ε 15 N NO3 and ε 18 O NO3 obtained in our work are consistent with values reported in the literature for denitrification, ranging from +6.5 to 39.0‰ and 1.0 to 30.4‰, respectively (Grau-Martínez et al, 2017;Margalef-Marti, Carrey, Merchán, et al, 2019) for freshwater denitrification studies, depending on the environmental conditions, organic matter source employed and biomass community. δ 15 N-NO 3 versus δ 18 O-NO 3 showed a positive linear correlation with a slope of 0.71 in B-L and 0.82 in B-V (Figure 4b), indicating a high enrichment effect on ε 15 N NO3 .…”
Section: Batch Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Limited NO 3 removal in the case of B-V might show larger fractionation (i.e., more negative 15 ε) values consistent with Mariotti et al (1988), who proposed that larger fractionation is expected for a lower denitrification rate. The ε 15 N NO3 and ε 18 O NO3 obtained in our work are consistent with values reported in the literature for denitrification, ranging from +6.5 to 39.0‰ and 1.0 to 30.4‰, respectively (Grau-Martínez et al, 2017;Margalef-Marti, Carrey, Merchán, et al, 2019) for freshwater denitrification studies, depending on the environmental conditions, organic matter source employed and biomass community. δ 15 N-NO 3 versus δ 18 O-NO 3 showed a positive linear correlation with a slope of 0.71 in B-L and 0.82 in B-V (Figure 4b), indicating a high enrichment effect on ε 15 N NO3 .…”
Section: Batch Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In 2015, a CW was built in the Lerma basin to remove N before discharge into the environment. Details on the construction and operation of the Lerma Basin CW can be found in Margalef-Marti, Carrey, Merchán, et al (2019) and Merchán et al (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The limited variation of δ 18 O NO3 values along the study indicated a negligible isotopic effect from plant uptake. Also, it pointed that denitrification was not significant along the experimental period even if organic carbon in pig slurry could have induced this process, especially during the spring-summer season due to the higher temperatures (Dawson and Murphy, 1972;Elefsiniotis and Li, 2006;Margalef-Marti et al, 2019). Hence, it was reinforced that the measured NO 2 and N 2 O during the experiment (Table S3) were produced from nitrification rather than denitrification (Beeckman et al, 2018;Caranto and Lancaster, 2017;Morley et al, 2008;Wunderlin et al, 2012).…”
Section: N Cycling Effects On Concentration and Isotopic Composition ...mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…CW facilitate the removal of chemicals from wastewater and also homogenize the physical and chemical characteristics of the flow (Schaafsma et al, 2000). As such, they offer low-cost and low-maintenance processes of removing wastewater N and P through precipitation into the soil bottom, soil adsorption of chemicals, plant uptake with organic matter accumulation, and microbial immobilization (Margalef-Martí et al, 2019). In addition, they provide new habitats for aquatic organisms, refuges for wildlife, and can be used as recreational or educational facilities (Zhang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%