2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2022.106949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility of video/audio monitoring in the analysis of motion and treatment effects on night-time seizures – Interventional study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unequivocal seizures from previous recording sessions of enrolled patients were utilized only if they lacked unequivocal seizures in the latest monitoring period. Training patients were selected partly from a recent interventional study (22) and partly from Nelli R post-market surveillance (PMS) recordings, and testing patients were selected from Nelli R PMS recordings with the requirement that, for each subject, at least three unequivocal seizures of these three seizure types of interest were recorded during Nelli R registration and they had been described in detail in previous video-EEG reports. Due to the exclusion criteria listed above, 130 seizures from 10 patients formed a cohort for the model training, including four patients from the previous study (22).…”
Section: Methods Patient Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unequivocal seizures from previous recording sessions of enrolled patients were utilized only if they lacked unequivocal seizures in the latest monitoring period. Training patients were selected partly from a recent interventional study (22) and partly from Nelli R post-market surveillance (PMS) recordings, and testing patients were selected from Nelli R PMS recordings with the requirement that, for each subject, at least three unequivocal seizures of these three seizure types of interest were recorded during Nelli R registration and they had been described in detail in previous video-EEG reports. Due to the exclusion criteria listed above, 130 seizures from 10 patients formed a cohort for the model training, including four patients from the previous study (22).…”
Section: Methods Patient Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Training patients were selected partly from a recent interventional study (22) and partly from Nelli R post-market surveillance (PMS) recordings, and testing patients were selected from Nelli R PMS recordings with the requirement that, for each subject, at least three unequivocal seizures of these three seizure types of interest were recorded during Nelli R registration and they had been described in detail in previous video-EEG reports. Due to the exclusion criteria listed above, 130 seizures from 10 patients formed a cohort for the model training, including four patients from the previous study (22). The testing patient cohort consisted of 98 seizures from 17 patients, who were not included in the training phase, to evaluate the performance of the model.…”
Section: Methods Patient Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…HVEM cost1, HVEM cost2, and HVEM cost3 are the HVEM cost after 1, 2, and 3 weeks of monitoring respectively; P1, P2, and P3 are the proportions of patients who achieve the diagnostic goal after 1, 2, and 3 weeks respectively. Therefore, the mean HVEM-DRE cost was calculated as follows: Mean HVEM-DRE cost1 = HVEM cost1 * P1 + (HVEM cost1 + In-hospital VEM cost) * (1-P1) (15) Mean HVEM-DRE cost2 = HVEM cost1 * P1 + HVEM cost2 * (P2 -P1) + (HVEM cost2 + In-hospital VEM cost) * (1-P2) (16) Mean HVEM-DRE costn = HVEM cost1 * P1 + HVEM cost2 * (P2 -P1) + …+ HVEM costn * (Pn -Pn-1) + (HVEM costn + In-hospital VEM cost) * (1-Pn)(17)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%