Feasibility Study of “CO2 Free Hydrogen Chain” Utilizing Australian Brown Coal Linked with CCS

Yoshino, Yūji; Harada, Eiichi; Inoue, Kenji; Yoshimura, Kenjiro; Yamashita, Seiji; Hakamada, Kazuhide

doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2012.09.082

Cited by 25 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Various transport options are considered, but a global market and ammonia as hydrogen carrier are not included. In a feasibility study by Kawasaki [14][15][16], hydrogen is produced from brown coal with CCS technology in Australia and transported using large LH2 ships. The assumptions are detailed and transparent.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Large-scale production and transport of hydrogen from Norway to Europe and Japan: Value chain analysis and comparison of liquid hydrogen and ammonia as energy carriers

Ishimoto

Voldsund

Nekså

et al. 2020

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

183

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Large-scale production and transport of hydrogen from Norway to Europe and Japan: Value chain analysis and comparison of liquid hydrogen and ammonia as energy carriers

Ishimoto

Voldsund

Nekså

et al. 2020

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

183

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Moreover, China Petroleum and Chemical Corporation has built a 1 million tons/year CCUS (coal gas tail gas CO2 capture + EOR) in the Qilu Petrochemical-Shengli Oilfield. This demonstration project is the first million-ton CCUS project and the largest full-process CCUS project in China (Figure 6) [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. (3) Large-scale coal bases have formed concentrated areas for the development and use of coal resources in China, which will help the state to enhance their macro-control over coal resources, to adjust and optimize the coal industrial structure, and to strengthen the comprehensive use of coal resources.…”

Section: Ccus Trends and Objectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For example, the implementation of CO 2 -ESWR in Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, and other western regions will help to alleviate the key problems caused by CO 2 emissions and water demand in coal bases. CO 2 sequestration in coal goafs also has considerable potential for carbon emission reduction, which can improve the extraction rate of coal mine gas and control the atmospheric emissions and leakage of coal mine gas[48][49][50][51][52].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Habitable Earth and Carbon Neutrality: Mission and Challenges Facing Resources and the Environment in China—An Overview

Zhang

Yan

et al. 2023

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since the Industrial Revolution, the impacts of human activities have changed the global climate system, and climate warming has had rapid and widespread effects on the planet. At present, the world is experiencing a series of natural disasters, such as climate change, environmental pollution, biodiversity loss, and sea level rise, which pose a serious threat to the livability of the Earth. An international consensus has been reached that achieving carbon neutrality is the key to tackling climate change; it is also crucial to building a livable planet. To achieve carbon neutrality, energy is the main aspect, for which technology regarding resources and the environment is essential. In this context, we collected data, performed an in-depth analysis of the basic and structural characteristics of the development of the coal industry and environmental remediation, studied and judged the trends in regional economic development and demand growth, and closely examined the requirements of China’s development strategy, which focuses on the ideas of carbon peak and carbon neutralization in line with local development trends and economic system characteristics. We must build a livable Earth, promote the green and low-carbon transformation of regional energy, promote high-quality economic development, and ensure the safe supply of energy.

show abstract

“…Kawasaki Heavy Industries and Iwatani Corp. have partnered with Kobe city to build a liquefied hydrogen import hub by 2020 [86]. CCS is seen by Kawasaki Heavy Industries as central to meeting its requirement for carbon dioxide-(CO2)-free hydrogen [87], and to meeting the Japanese Government's goal of 'an emission-free "hydrogen society" in which hydrogen will be the primary energy medium' [88] (p. 12733). While the pilot is going ahead, CCS is only seen as coming later with the project's expansion for commercialization [35] (p. 50).…”

Section: Brown Hydrogenmentioning

confidence: 99%

EU Carbon Diplomacy: Assessing Hydrogen Security and Policy Impact in Australia and Germany

Hancock

Wollersheim

2021

Energies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hydrogen is fast becoming a new international “super fuel” to accelerate global climate change ambitions. This paper has two inter-weaving themes. Contextually, it focuses on the potential impact of the EU’s new Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) on fossil fuel-generated as opposed to green hydrogen imports. The CBAM, as a transnational carbon adjustment mechanism, has the potential to impact international trade in energy. It seeks both a level playing field between imports and EU internal markets (subject to ambitious EU climate change policies), and to encourage emissions reduction laggards through its “carbon diplomacy”. Countries without a price on carbon will be charged for embodied carbon in their supply chains when they export to the EU. Empirically, we focus on two hydrogen export/import case studies: Australia as a non-EU state with ambitions to export hydrogen, and Germany as an EU Member State reliant on energy imports. Energy security is central to energy trade debates but needs to be conceptualized beyond supply and demand economics to include geopolitics, just transitions and the impacts of border carbon taxes and EU carbon diplomacy. Accordingly, we apply and further develop a seven-dimension energy security-justice framework to the examples of brown, blue and green hydrogen export/import hydrogen operations, with varying carbon-intensity supply chains, in Australia and Germany. Applying the framework, we identify potential impact—risks and opportunities—associated with identified brown, blue and green hydrogen export/import projects in the two countries. This research contributes to the emerging fields of international hydrogen trade, supply chains, and international carbon diplomacy and develops a potentially useful seven-dimension energy security-justice framework for energy researchers and policy analysts.

show abstract

Feasibility Study of “CO2 Free Hydrogen Chain” Utilizing Australian Brown Coal Linked with CCS

Cited by 25 publications

References 0 publications

Large-scale production and transport of hydrogen from Norway to Europe and Japan: Value chain analysis and comparison of liquid hydrogen and ammonia as energy carriers

Large-scale production and transport of hydrogen from Norway to Europe and Japan: Value chain analysis and comparison of liquid hydrogen and ammonia as energy carriers

A Habitable Earth and Carbon Neutrality: Mission and Challenges Facing Resources and the Environment in China—An Overview

EU Carbon Diplomacy: Assessing Hydrogen Security and Policy Impact in Australia and Germany

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About