2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.01.20043794
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility Study of Mitigation and Suppression Strategies for Controlling COVID-19 Outbreaks in London and Wuhan

Abstract: Recent outbreaks of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led a global pandemic cross the world. Most countries took two main interventions: suppression like immediate lockdown cities at epicentre or mitigation that slows down but not stopping epidemic for reducing peak healthcare demand. Both strategies have their

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before the invention of vaccines, many community health techniques such as mitigation, suppression, and shield immunity have been suggested and used to control the COVID-19 outbreak [3][4][5]. They have been applied in many countries with different degrees of effectiveness depending on how individuals react to prescribed policies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the invention of vaccines, many community health techniques such as mitigation, suppression, and shield immunity have been suggested and used to control the COVID-19 outbreak [3][4][5]. They have been applied in many countries with different degrees of effectiveness depending on how individuals react to prescribed policies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…β1 and β2 respectively correspond to the infection rate of Infectious [I] and Exposed [E] (infected but asymptomatic). Intervention intensity was assumed within the interval [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], gave with a relatively accurate estimation of COVID-19 breakouts. 24 The value of population density and population mobility in London and the UK were calibrated and different interventions were implemented to estimate the COVID infection situation.…”
Section: Model Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We implemented a modified SEIR model, which called SECMVRD model to account for a dynamic Susceptible [S], Exposed [E] (infected but asymptomatic), Infectious [I] (infected and symptomatic),[V] (vaccinated) , Recovered [R] and Deceased [D] population state. [16][17][18][19] For estimating healthcare needs, the infectious group was categorized into two sub-cases: Mild [M] and Critical [C] (mild cases did not require hospital beds and critical cases need hospital beds but possibly cannot get it due to shortage of health sources). [20][21][22] Meanwhile, the vaccinated population was divided the into two sub-cases: Vaccinated1 [V1] and Vaccinated2 [V1], where V1 is the population who has received the first dose of vaccine, and V2 is the population who has received the second dose of vaccine.…”
Section: Model Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of mathematical COVID-19 simulations have recently appeared. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Most of them are based on deterministic continuoustime epidemiological models, which consider age-independent epidemiological classes of, for example, susceptible (S), exposed (E), infected (I), and recovered (R) individuals, [11][12][13][14][15][16] whose numbers S(t), E(t), I(t), R(t) evolve in time (t) according to a system of (deterministic) ordinary differential equations. Open access sources already available [17][18][19] enable one to easily perform various numerical simulations by means of such models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%