Oceans 2014 - Taipei 2014
DOI: 10.1109/oceans-taipei.2014.6964350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility study of noise reduction for imaging sonar based on time-domain filtering

Abstract: Underwater sonar image can be obtained by the multi-beam imaging sonar. Because of its high frame rate, the imaging sonar can be used for underwater survey especially in turbid water condition. However, the sonar image is generally degraded by the speckle noise. In this paper, we propose a realtime noise reduction algorithm by using the recursive least square algorithm, which is one of the adaptive filters. Through experiments, the performance of the proposed algorithm is analyzed and its feasibility is determ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combing the wavelet transform with a pulse coupled neural network expects to generate precise methods for sonar image segmentation. (7) The wavelet transform has an aptitude for image feature extraction. Deep learning can omnidirectionally percept and memorize the image features so as to precisely classify (or segment) the images if there are a large number of learning samples and sample selection is reasonable.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Combing the wavelet transform with a pulse coupled neural network expects to generate precise methods for sonar image segmentation. (7) The wavelet transform has an aptitude for image feature extraction. Deep learning can omnidirectionally percept and memorize the image features so as to precisely classify (or segment) the images if there are a large number of learning samples and sample selection is reasonable.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…59 Table 1 shows the general comparison between underwater optical imaging (underwater optical images) and underwater acoustical imaging (sonar images). 1,2,[5][6][7][8]11,40,59,60 In Table 1, the "Low," "High," and "Bad" are the descriptions compared with the ones of optical imaging (optical images) in the air. The "More low," "More high," and "More bad" are the descriptions compared with the ones of underwater optical imaging (underwater optical images).…”
Section: Brief Description Of Sonar Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations