Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is technically challenging as a result of a lack of depth perception. The present article investigated the 3‐D endoscope for carrying out ESD and translated the technique from bench to clinical use. In a preclinical porcine experiment, ESD using a 3‐D endoscope was compared between an experienced and a novice endoscopist. All ESD were completed without perforation. Median operative time per surface area was significantly lower for the experienced endoscopist than for the novice (197.9 s/cm2 vs 434.7 s/cm2; P = 0.05). The second part was a prospective clinical experience to evaluate use of the 3‐D endoscope for carrying out ESD. Ten patients received ESD using the 3‐D endoscope. Four patients had gastric ESD, two had duodenal ESD and four had sigmoid and rectal ESD. There were no complications, whereas ESD failed in one patient who had gastric neoplasia at anastomosis. Mean operative time was 99.4 min, and operative time per surface area resection was 391 s/cm2. The operating endoscopist did not complain of motion sickness, whereas the assistants had some dizziness upon prolonged ESD procedure. This study showed that carrying out ESD was safe and effective using a 3‐D endoscope with an excellent 3‐D view enhancing depth perception. Future study should be conducted to compare 3‐D against 2‐D endoscopes for ESD.