2011
DOI: 10.1109/tro.2010.2085790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasible and Optimal Path Planning in Strong Current Fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
72
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To embed the directional constraints f within such an anisotropic FMM different specific cost functions have been proposed mainly for autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) [14,25]. The drag and flow forces have a significant effect on the motion of the AUV, which is a common problem with our microrobot planning problem.…”
Section: B Navigation Planning In Flow 1) Minimal Path Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To embed the directional constraints f within such an anisotropic FMM different specific cost functions have been proposed mainly for autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) [14,25]. The drag and flow forces have a significant effect on the motion of the AUV, which is a common problem with our microrobot planning problem.…”
Section: B Navigation Planning In Flow 1) Minimal Path Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the strength of the local wind is larger than the maximum vehicle velocity, impassible zones are created which many planners do not account for [6]. Moreover, while many planners consider wind as a disturbance whose influence is suppressed by the vehicle's autopilot [7], the wind vector field has the potential to be used as a source for powering the UAV to further reduce energy consumption and travel time [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This policy promotes more realistic and feasible paths and has the added benefit of reducing the search space. An example of this type of planner is presented by Soulignac to provide feasible and the minimum-time optimal path for small UAVs in the presence of strong current fields [6]. Unfortunately, the research is performed in 2D and does not include other objectives such as fuel or risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Constraining the vehicle to move in an 8-connected grid also means that optimality is compromised in the graph discretisation alone, a continuous technique is desirable. Continuous planning techniques have been explored for both AUVs and gliders alike in [8][10] [11]and [12] .Without the constraining of 8-connective,the problem had been considered further in [9]and [13]. The gliding motion control of underwater gliders can be described by considering a typical diving and surfacing cycle, but we can only control the glider at the surfacing cycle for the unavailable underwater communication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%