Stock Enhancement and Sea Ranching 2004
DOI: 10.1002/9780470751329.ch6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feats and Defeats in Flatfish Stocking: Determinants for Effective Stocking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…releasing hatchery-reared [HR] juveniles) of commercially important organisms. Stocking should be implemented within the 'available' carrying capacity (Støttrup 2004), to allow for a residual production of prey after consumption by both existing and stocked predators. Some studies suggest me thods to determine stocking density within the carrying capacity (Taylor et al 2005, Yamashita et al 2006, Taylor & Suthers 2008, Ochwada-Doyle et al 2012), but current stock enhancement programs have not given this concept much consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…releasing hatchery-reared [HR] juveniles) of commercially important organisms. Stocking should be implemented within the 'available' carrying capacity (Støttrup 2004), to allow for a residual production of prey after consumption by both existing and stocked predators. Some studies suggest me thods to determine stocking density within the carrying capacity (Taylor et al 2005, Yamashita et al 2006, Taylor & Suthers 2008, Ochwada-Doyle et al 2012), but current stock enhancement programs have not given this concept much consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trials with turbot, Psetta maxima (L.), in an exposed coast in inner Danish waters showed that it is possible to stock flatfish species to increase local recruitment, if both the ecological and biological criteria for stocking are addressed (Støttrup, Sparrevohn, Modin & Lehmann 2002; Støttrup 2004). One of these criteria involves choice of location and ensuring an ideal habitat with regards to both biotic and abiotic factors for the released fish.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, growth of other strong year-classes such as the 1999 and 2004 year-classes ( Figure 4) was not decreased, possibly because food was generally abundant and carrying capacity was seldom reached (van der Veer et al, 2000). Available carrying capacity is a necessary condition for successful stocking (Støttrup, 2004). Excessive releases (overstocking) will inhibit growth of wild flounder (Yamashita et al, 2006) and thus result in the reduction of wild fish production, a form of lost production caused by releases.…”
Section: Issues Concerning Stocking and Wild Population Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%