2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/dsaa.2017.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature Analysis for Fake Review Detection through Supervised Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the aforementioned studies have proposed a spam reviews detection technique while working on the dataset “DOSC” such as Narayan et al (), Etaiwi and Awajan (), Mani et al () and Etaiwi and Naymat () while Vanta and Aono () proposed the technique while working on “YelpNYC” dataset and (Fontanarava et al, ) worked on “YelpZIP” dataset.…”
Section: Evaluation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some of the aforementioned studies have proposed a spam reviews detection technique while working on the dataset “DOSC” such as Narayan et al (), Etaiwi and Awajan (), Mani et al () and Etaiwi and Naymat () while Vanta and Aono () proposed the technique while working on “YelpNYC” dataset and (Fontanarava et al, ) worked on “YelpZIP” dataset.…”
Section: Evaluation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vanta and Aono () used some features extracted from reviews' texts and reviews' ratings and achieved an accuracy of 78.40%, a precision of 78.40%, and a recall of 78.40%. Fontanarava et al () analyzed the most appropriate review and reviewer‐centric features for the detection of spam reviews and reached an accuracy of 80.60%, a precision of 77.60%, and a recall of 86.10%.…”
Section: Evaluation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, combining spam review detection and spammer detection by analyzing their behaviors is more effective solution for detecting review spam than either approach alone. In this way, we cite the proposed methods in (Fontanarava et al, 2017;Rayana and Akoglu, 2015), that exploit both relational data and metadata of reviewers and reviews. Results prove that this kind of methods outperform all others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reviews refer to any view or opinion made about a product or service by an individual usually not associated with the business. The reviews that appear on the website are specifically referred to as user generated content (UGC) [2]. Reviews present a new way to learn about customer preferences, product quality as well as product"s shortcomings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%