2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature-based Supervision of Shear Cutting Processes on the Basis of Force Measurements: Evaluation of Feature Engineering and Feature Extraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The feature engineering used in this paper is based on the results of Hohmann et al, Hoppe et al, and Übelacker and is shown in Fig. 7 [40,41]. The force signal is initially divided into three phases.…”
Section: Feature Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The feature engineering used in this paper is based on the results of Hohmann et al, Hoppe et al, and Übelacker and is shown in Fig. 7 [40,41]. The force signal is initially divided into three phases.…”
Section: Feature Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Cutting phases during which the punch is in contact with the sheet metal (a) shown for a complete stroke cycle (b) Fig. 7 Features extracted from force-displacement curves [8,40] is changed only slightly. These results correspond to the features extracted in Fig.…”
Section: Cutting Edge Radiimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the wide variety of machine-, tool-, material-and process-parameters and their mutual dependencies render it very difficult to compare the results of different process studies. [3,7,8] Fig. 2: Selection of process parameters that are most likely to influence the cutting surface parameters The influence of these process parameters, lack of an accurate prediction of material separation and rigidity requirements from the process also complicate the design and dimensioning of the stamping tool [9,8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. [7] showed a comparison of engineered features and feature extraction. Hambli [25] trained a neural network with a large number of FE Simulation to predict the height of the burr.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%