2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-71975-3_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature Extraction and Classification of Colon Cancer Using a Hybrid Approach of Supervised and Unsupervised Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modifications to the VGG-inspired CNN model ConvNet were evaluated by identifying colorectal cells, yielding values of 93.48%, 0.4385, 95.10%, and 92.76%, for accuracy, loss, sensitivity, and specificity, respectively [ 39 ]. Ghosh et al reported that the proposed classifiers had the highest classification accuracy (98.60%) among classifiers, ranging from 88.71% to 98.40% [ 51 ]. Furthermore, the diagnostic performance of AI and endoscopists yielded sensitivities of 97.30% and 87.40%, respectively, specificities of 99.00% and 96.40%, respectively, and processing times of 0.022 s/image and 2.4 s/image, respectively [ 46 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Modifications to the VGG-inspired CNN model ConvNet were evaluated by identifying colorectal cells, yielding values of 93.48%, 0.4385, 95.10%, and 92.76%, for accuracy, loss, sensitivity, and specificity, respectively [ 39 ]. Ghosh et al reported that the proposed classifiers had the highest classification accuracy (98.60%) among classifiers, ranging from 88.71% to 98.40% [ 51 ]. Furthermore, the diagnostic performance of AI and endoscopists yielded sensitivities of 97.30% and 87.40%, respectively, specificities of 99.00% and 96.40%, respectively, and processing times of 0.022 s/image and 2.4 s/image, respectively [ 46 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ghosh et al developed a hybrid learning model that combined two machine learning techniques involving supervised (SL) and unsupervised learning techniques for the detection of colon cancer. This yielded better accuracy than existing approaches and could potentially be used for real-time cancer detection [ 51 ]. This study evaluated data clustering by K-means, the Girvan–Newman algorithm, and Mahalanobis distance-based clustering, followed by feature selection and dimensionality reduction based on principal component analysis.…”
Section: Methodological Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%