2016 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Control and Intelligent Systems (I2CACIS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/i2cacis.2016.7885304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature extraction of surface electromyography (sEMG) and signal processing technique in wavelet transform: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A Daubechies mother wavelet of fourth order ‘db4′ was used due to its similarity to the triphasic pattern of the motor unit action potential [44]. Consistent with the analysis of other bio-signals, DWT decomposition was performed using six levels [43,45,46,47,48]. The wavelet analysis was performed in two steps, as presented in Figure 2:The EMG signals were decomposed into seven sub-bands, one approximate coefficient (cA6), and six detail coefficients (cD1, …, cD6).The EMG signal was then reconstructed at each level using inverse discrete wavelet transform, and seven EMG reconstructed signals (A6, D1, …, D6) were obtained from their coefficients (cA6, cD1, …, cD1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Daubechies mother wavelet of fourth order ‘db4′ was used due to its similarity to the triphasic pattern of the motor unit action potential [44]. Consistent with the analysis of other bio-signals, DWT decomposition was performed using six levels [43,45,46,47,48]. The wavelet analysis was performed in two steps, as presented in Figure 2:The EMG signals were decomposed into seven sub-bands, one approximate coefficient (cA6), and six detail coefficients (cD1, …, cD6).The EMG signal was then reconstructed at each level using inverse discrete wavelet transform, and seven EMG reconstructed signals (A6, D1, …, D6) were obtained from their coefficients (cA6, cD1, …, cD1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TFD features are a good choice for processing sEMG signals due to their ability to process non-stationary signal like sEMG signals where the presence of frequency components vary with time. (Burhan, Kasno, & Ghzali, 2016) [9] in their work explained the processing of such non-stationary signals in detail using TFD techniques such as Short-time Fourier Transform(STFT), wavelet transform(WT), and wavelet packet transform(WPT).…”
Section: 2: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feature extraction and classification are the most critical technologies in sEMG-based pattern recognition technology. To date, the time domain, frequency domain, and time-frequency domain features have been widely used for the analysis and processing of sEMG signals (Burhan and Ghazali, 2016; Majid et al, 2018; Phinyomark et al, 2018). In addition, many classifier algorithms have appeared for classification, such as SVM, artificial neural networks (ANNs), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) (Chowdhury et al, 2013; Nazmi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%