2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature selection for event discovery in social media: A comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, people can expand their network in society and finally form a big social network. Generally, social networks can provide a number of new applications and services, such as news feature exploration [7], event monitoring [8,9], and sentiment analysis of reviews [10].…”
Section: Knowledge Sharing In Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, people can expand their network in society and finally form a big social network. Generally, social networks can provide a number of new applications and services, such as news feature exploration [7], event monitoring [8,9], and sentiment analysis of reviews [10].…”
Section: Knowledge Sharing In Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, we will consider integrating social network tools with the teaching of management information systems courses [9,10]. Another research direction is to develop Web-based systems that can automatically crawl teaching resources from the Web and form a standard database of teaching materials [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional UGC research has focused primarily on online reviews and electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in trading communities. Thus, UGC has multiple research areas and can be divided into four categories: users' participant motivation [8], the influence of content [6], content mining [9], and content management [10]. In these studies, online reviews [11] and eWOM [12] are the most common foci, along with reviews released by consumers [13] and consumers' perceived value of reviews [14].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%