1998
DOI: 10.1049/el:19981069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature selection using genetic algorithmand its application to speaker verification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because of the fact that the performance of classifier and the cost of classification are sensitive to the selection of the features used in the construction of the classifier. By reducing the set of features, the time required for learning the classification knowledge and the time needed for classification reduces [26]. Further, by the extraction of relevant features and therefore the elimination of the irrelevant ones, the accuracy of the classifier can be increased.…”
Section: Feature Set Selection Using Genetic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because of the fact that the performance of classifier and the cost of classification are sensitive to the selection of the features used in the construction of the classifier. By reducing the set of features, the time required for learning the classification knowledge and the time needed for classification reduces [26]. Further, by the extraction of relevant features and therefore the elimination of the irrelevant ones, the accuracy of the classifier can be increased.…”
Section: Feature Set Selection Using Genetic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on speaker verification has been focused on speaker models [2], feature selection [3], and robust methods [4]. Higgins used a discriminate counting to verify the speaker [5], as well as likelihood score normalization methods [6]- [8], which are two likelihood score normalization methods by using impostor models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GSMSV is different from both the speaker verification methods with the conventional likelihood score (noted as CSV method in the following) [3] and the normalization method proposed in [6]. As we know, CSV method has some limitations, i.e., the loose distribution of likelihood scores leading to the vague boundaries between speakers and the burden to set a proper threshold, as well as the low system adaptability to protean input utterances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%