2015 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2015.7325967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature space dimensionality reduction for the optimization of visualization methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The feature extraction stage aims to describe the content of each patch through the use of specific descriptors. For this study we have used a concatenated feature vector meaning that we have included the spectral signature, texture and the Weber Local Descriptors [7]. The derived multidimensional space was projected in the IVI using three dimensionality reduction methods: Principal Component Analysis, Stochastic Proximity Embedding and t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding [6] [7].…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The feature extraction stage aims to describe the content of each patch through the use of specific descriptors. For this study we have used a concatenated feature vector meaning that we have included the spectral signature, texture and the Weber Local Descriptors [7]. The derived multidimensional space was projected in the IVI using three dimensionality reduction methods: Principal Component Analysis, Stochastic Proximity Embedding and t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding [6] [7].…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) Sentinel-2 scene revealing a forestred area at 04.2018; (b) Corine Landcover classes overlapping the scene, supporting the user in the selection of the positive (green) and negative (red) samples for the training class; the projection of the multidimensional space of the feature vectors using Stochastic proximity embedding alogorithm (c)[6] and Principal Component Analysis algorithm (d)[7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They envisage multilayers transformation based on various rules to weight down the number of features by preserving the relevant information. Specific results for remote sensing data visualisation are presented in [20].…”
Section: Visual Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparative review of the recent developed non-linear DR methods was presented in [14]. The performance of three DR techniques in the visualization field of the remote sensing image dataset was studied in [15]. Principal Component Analysis, Linear Discriminant Analysis and t-distributed Stochastic Neighbour Embedding algorithms ware used to delineate an optimal image content visualization method.…”
Section: Review On Current Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%