2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Features of graded category structure: Generalizing the family resemblance and polymorphous concept models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They combine a relatively weak internal structure with strong links to external categories. Our results resemble those of Dry and Storms (2010), who applied the generalized polymorphous concept model to account for concrete categories' graded structures. They too found that the contribution of external feature information varied from one category to the other.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…They combine a relatively weak internal structure with strong links to external categories. Our results resemble those of Dry and Storms (2010), who applied the generalized polymorphous concept model to account for concrete categories' graded structures. They too found that the contribution of external feature information varied from one category to the other.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Setting θ to low values emphasizes distinctive features, whereas setting θ to high values emphasizes common features. Dry and Storms (2010) noted that the first and third terms in Eq. (3) are collinear.…”
Section: The Generalized Polymorphous Concept Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If one had specific hypotheses about the measures that determine an item's position along the latent scale one could test these by expressing the β i 's as a linear combination of these predictors. For instance, according to the generalized polymorphous concept model, the similarity between an item and a category can be expressed as a weighted combination of the number of characteristic features shared by item and category, and the number of features that are distinct to the item (Dry & Storms, 2010). Dry and Storms demonstrated how both common and distinctive feature information play a role in the prediction of items' typicality ratings (i.e., item-category-similarity).…”
Section: Explanatory Item Response Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%