Features of representations in general chemistry textbooks: a peek through the lens of the cognitive load theory

Abstract

The goals of this study were (1) determine the prevalence of various features of representations in five general chemistry textbooks used in the United States, and (2) use cognitive load theory to draw implications of the various features of analyzed representations. We adapted the Graphical Analysis Protocol (GAP) to look at the type of representations used, the function of each representation, the physical integration of representations with associated text, the presence and nature of captions and labels, the indexing of representations, and the number of representations requiring conceptual integration on a given page. Results indicate that on average, in all five textbooks each page had at least four representations. Most representations served a 'representational' function, but a number functioned as decorative representations. Most representations were directly integrated with text, but some of the remaining representations were separated by a whole page from associated text. While many pages had an average of two representations that required conceptual integration with text or other representations, some pages had as many as six representations requiring integration. While using textbooks, learners can experience intrinsic, germane or extraneous cognitive load (Sweller, 1994). Our findings indicate that there are various features of representations that could help reduce intrinsic or extraneous cognitive load. However, we also found prevalent features of representations that imply high intrinsic cognitive load or are likely to lead to extraneous cognitive load. Implications for textbook authors and editors, textbook selection, instruction, and science teacher preparation are discussed.

Kimyasal Gösterimlerin Genel Kimya Ders Kitaplarında Kullanımı

“…The number of representations used in electrochemistry unit differed in general chemistry textbooks analyzed, which is compatible with the findings in the literature (Nyachwaya & Gillaspie, 2016;Nyachwaya & Wood, 2014). Differences in the number of representations among textbooks might stem from differences in publishers and writers of the textbooks.…”

An Analysis of the Visual Representation of Redox Reactions in Secondary Chemistry Textbooks from Different Chinese Communities

“…We evaluated how much of the visual representation is connected to the text for providing support to better understand the content, aside from just having a decorative function. Subsequently, we categorized the evaluation of image representation into decorative, organizational, or interpretational (see Table 3), which is an adaptation from Carney and Levin [51], and this was also interpreted by Nyachwaya et al [52]. Table 3.…”

Improving learners’ representational coherence ability with experiment-related representational activity tasks

“…Similar arguments can be found across science education (Refs. [27,29,109,110] for physics, chemistry, and biology education, respectively). Further effects of prior knowledge specifically related to multiple representations in the physical sciences have been discussed, for example, by Bodemer and Faust [111]; [6] Chap.…”

“…Third, the present work considered only RATs as an educational approach, in order to study their effects in a well-controlled way. In the future, it could be combined with other educational approaches of interest in the area, such as for joint gain of representational and conceptual competence [165,166], reducing cognitive load [71,72,109], for example, by worked examples, explicitly promoting self-generated representations (Ref. [4] Chap.…”