Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults (LADA) is a type of diabetes mellitus often overlooked in clinical practice for its dual resemblance to Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) in pathogenesis and to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) in clinical presentation. To better understand LADA’s distinctiveness from T1DM and T2DM, we conducted a comprehensive review encompassing etiology, pathology, clinical features, treatment modalities, and prognostic outcomes. With this comparative lens, we propose that LADA defies simple classification as either T1DM or T2DM. The specific treatments for the disease are limited and should be based on the therapies of T1DM or T2DM that address specific clinical issues at different stages of the disease. It is crucial to identify LADA cases potentially misdiagnosed as T2DM, warranting prompt screening for poor blood sugar control, short-term blood sugar deterioration, and other conditions. If the prognosis for LADA is similar to T2DM, it can be managed as T2DM. However, if the prognosis fundamentally differs, early LADA screening is crucial to optimize patient outcomes and enhance research on tailored treatments. The pathogenesis of LADA is clear, so the prognosis may be the key to determining whether it can be classified as T2DM, which is also the direction of future research. On the one hand, this paper aims to provide suggestions for the clinical screening and treatment of LADA based on the latest progress and provide worthy directions for future research on LADA.
Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults (LADA) is a type of diabetes mellitus often overlooked in clinical practice for its dual resemblance to Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) in pathogenesis and to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) in clinical presentation. To better understand LADA’s distinctiveness from T1DM and T2DM, we conducted a comprehensive review encompassing etiology, pathology, clinical features, treatment modalities, and prognostic outcomes. With this comparative lens, we propose that LADA defies simple classification as either T1DM or T2DM. The specific treatments for the disease are limited and should be based on the therapies of T1DM or T2DM that address specific clinical issues at different stages of the disease. It is crucial to identify LADA cases potentially misdiagnosed as T2DM, warranting prompt screening for poor blood sugar control, short-term blood sugar deterioration, and other conditions. If the prognosis for LADA is similar to T2DM, it can be managed as T2DM. However, if the prognosis fundamentally differs, early LADA screening is crucial to optimize patient outcomes and enhance research on tailored treatments. The pathogenesis of LADA is clear, so the prognosis may be the key to determining whether it can be classified as T2DM, which is also the direction of future research. On the one hand, this paper aims to provide suggestions for the clinical screening and treatment of LADA based on the latest progress and provide worthy directions for future research on LADA.
Type 1 diabetes mellitus is a condition caused by autoimmune damage to insulin–producing beta cells of the pancreatic islets, leading to endogenous insulin deficiency. Despite the sufficient knowledge of the disease and the availability of clinical recommendations for substitution therapy, the number of patients with this pathology is growing worldwide. At the same time, their cohort is very heterogeneous, including amid different etiology, concomitant genetic background, variations in the manifestation of the disease and severity. In this regard, traditional ideas about type 1 diabetes mellitus are being questioned, which requires special attention when managing patients with a clinical picture of the disease that differs from the traditional one. The article presents a clinical case of type 1 diabetes mellitus in a young patient, which demonstrates the importance of a personalized approach to the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic patients with a "non-classical" history.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.