1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf00779393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Features of the fatigue failure of steel with metastable austenite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 Fatigue data analysed by Murakami 12 led to the proposal of a ‘defect free fatigue limit’ σ w0 , which can be calculated from the tensile strength σ U or the hardness (HV) This relationship has been shown to work well for hardness values below ∼400 HV, independent of microstructure and even for aluminium alloys. However, L'vov et al 13 studied a steel which contained metastable austenite and concluded that the microstructure did have an influence, both through the austenite substructure resulting from warm deformation during processing, and by transformation to martensite during loading. It is possible that both of these would be reflected in increased ultimate tensile strength and hardness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Fatigue data analysed by Murakami 12 led to the proposal of a ‘defect free fatigue limit’ σ w0 , which can be calculated from the tensile strength σ U or the hardness (HV) This relationship has been shown to work well for hardness values below ∼400 HV, independent of microstructure and even for aluminium alloys. However, L'vov et al 13 studied a steel which contained metastable austenite and concluded that the microstructure did have an influence, both through the austenite substructure resulting from warm deformation during processing, and by transformation to martensite during loading. It is possible that both of these would be reflected in increased ultimate tensile strength and hardness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%