2019 10th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icccnt45670.2019.8944459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Features Selection for Facial Expression Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their study underscored the importance of preprocessing techniques in improving classification accuracy for dermatoscopic images. In addition to these advancements several methods have been applied to medical image segmentation [18,19]. Eltayef et al [20] proposed an automated approach for melanoma border detection based on PSO and Markov Random Field (MRF) algorithms, achieving accurate edge detection.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their study underscored the importance of preprocessing techniques in improving classification accuracy for dermatoscopic images. In addition to these advancements several methods have been applied to medical image segmentation [18,19]. Eltayef et al [20] proposed an automated approach for melanoma border detection based on PSO and Markov Random Field (MRF) algorithms, achieving accurate edge detection.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the feature selection methods are classified into two techniques: wrapper and filter methods. The wrapper methods depend on the classification algorithm to evaluate the selected features subset; however, the accuracy of these methods is influenced by the attributes of the used classifier; therefore, if the parameters of the classifier are not accurately chosen, this may lead to a degradation of the accuracy of the selected features [19] [20]. Unlike the wrapper methods, the filter methods do not depend on the classification algorithm to evaluate the selected features and they are also less expensive than the wrapper methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%