1990
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.80.2.146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fecal contamination of shanty town toddlers in households with non-corralled poultry, Lima, Peru.

Abstract: We used direct observer techniques to measure the frequency with which toddler-aged children were contaminated by poultry feces in homes in a peri-urban shanty town in Lima, Peru. The mean number of fowl was 5.4 (SD 3.1), with 10.0 (SD 10.7) poultry defecations per 12 hours. Toddlers' hand contact with poultry feces occurred a mean of 2.9 (SD 3.0) times/12 hours. A mean of 3.9 (SD 4.6) feces-to-mouth episodes per household/12 hours occurred both by direct hand-to-mouth contamination and indirectly by handling … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
87
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
6
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result may be supported by the findings of an observational study conducted in Peru 1990, which showed that children frequently come into contact with poultry feces that lie within the homes and have 3.9 feces-to-mouth episodes within a 12-hour period [15,19]. Many other studies also indicated the association of Campylobacter diarrhea with the consumption of contaminated water or foods, ownership of livestock or poultry, or contact with animals [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This result may be supported by the findings of an observational study conducted in Peru 1990, which showed that children frequently come into contact with poultry feces that lie within the homes and have 3.9 feces-to-mouth episodes within a 12-hour period [15,19]. Many other studies also indicated the association of Campylobacter diarrhea with the consumption of contaminated water or foods, ownership of livestock or poultry, or contact with animals [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The current study showed conclusively that older age protected against resistance independent of its association with antibiotics use or the community serving level of home-raised chicken. One possible explanation is the increased likelihood for "oral investigation" among younger children, 50 which in the context of our study could be responsible for increased fecal-oral exposure. However, the fact that the youngest, least mobile, children were at highest risk suggests that this does not fully explain the finding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…We included this criteria to evaluate if small children in this population consumed chicken feces, as recently reported in rural Zimbabwe and previously in Peru. 21,29 At baseline, a 5-hour structured observation session was conducted by a trained research assistant between 8:00 AM and 1:00 PM in the household of each enrolled child. A structured questionnaire tool was used to collect information on whether the child touched or mouthed soil, mud, clay, sand, or feces during the structured observation period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%