2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06185-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) with Colonoscopy Is Superior to Enema and Nasogastric Tube While Comparable to Capsule for the Treatment of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
57
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical effect of FMT varied according to the delivery method and the number of administrations. In contrast to previous reviews [ 14 16 ], the current review demonstrates that lower GI endoscopy is superior to all other delivery modalities and not only enema or upper administration. This underpins lower GI endoscopy as the gold standard despite the absolute gain of effect relative to the other delivery methods following repeat FMT is minimal.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The clinical effect of FMT varied according to the delivery method and the number of administrations. In contrast to previous reviews [ 14 16 ], the current review demonstrates that lower GI endoscopy is superior to all other delivery modalities and not only enema or upper administration. This underpins lower GI endoscopy as the gold standard despite the absolute gain of effect relative to the other delivery methods following repeat FMT is minimal.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Previous systematic reviews [ 11 16 ] demonstrated similar high effect rates for FMT but did not include both observational and controlled studies. By including both, this review is the first to establish the quality of evidence for several important clinical determinants needed to consolidate FMT as an evidence-based treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, previous data suggest that adverse drug reactions attributed to conventional FMT are rare, if donor screening and FMT application are carried out correctly. Reported rates of minor and usually transient reactions are below 10% and usually affect the gastrointestinal tract [9][10][11][12] . Serious adverse drug reactions have mostly been observed as a consequence of incomplete donor screening [13] or as a complication related to the endoscopy procedure and not to FMT material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study by Ramai et al (2020) comparing various routes of administration of fecal transplantation between colonoscopic, nasogastric, capsule and enema in the treatment of recurrent C. difficile infection, there was a greater cure rate with colonoscopic (94.8%) administration and capsular (92.1%) compared to nasogastric (78.1%) and enema (87.2%). Although capsular administration was comparable in cure rate to colonoscopic administration, the use of capsules in this study had a smaller sample size when compared to colonoscopic (Ramai et al, 2020). Another example of the use of colonoscopic fecal transplantation is seen in a study measuring the efficacy of FMT in the treatment of Crohn's disease in which donor recipients received a single-dose fecal transplant.…”
Section: Fmt Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%