2018
DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5099/2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fecal microbiota transplantation in refractory or recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: a real-life experience in a non-academic center

Abstract: Author's contributionAna Ponte: design of the study, analysis and interpretation of the data and references and drafting of the article.Rolando Pinho: design of the study, analysis and interpretation of the data and references, drafting of the article and critical revision of the article for important intellectual content.Margarida Mota: design of the study, analysis and interpretation of the data.Nuno Vieira and Rosa Oliveira: design of the study.Joana Silva, Jaime Rodrigues, Mafalda Sousa and Isabel Sousa: a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted earlier, there is no consensus for best treatment options for CDI refractory to conventional therapy [ 6 ]. Previous studies have included refractory with the recurrent CDI cases and thus, did not evaluate refractory cases separately [ 17 20 ] except in one case series from South Korea looking at the response of patients with refractory CDI to FMT [ 21 ] and an observational study evaluating the effect of adapting FMT as institutional practice on overall institutional mortality of patients with refractory CDI [ 22 ]. One difficulty is the definition of “refractory” as opposed to “recurrent”.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted earlier, there is no consensus for best treatment options for CDI refractory to conventional therapy [ 6 ]. Previous studies have included refractory with the recurrent CDI cases and thus, did not evaluate refractory cases separately [ 17 20 ] except in one case series from South Korea looking at the response of patients with refractory CDI to FMT [ 21 ] and an observational study evaluating the effect of adapting FMT as institutional practice on overall institutional mortality of patients with refractory CDI [ 22 ]. One difficulty is the definition of “refractory” as opposed to “recurrent”.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18][19][20][21][22][23][24] Effectiveness of FMT in patients with refractory or fulminant CDI versus recurrent CDI: there was inconsistent evidence which suggested no difference in effect for these patient groups. [25][26][27][28][29] Effectiveness of FMT in patients with pseudomembranous colitis compared with other patients: there was weak evidence, and it is not clear whether in these patients FMT may be less successful. 19 22 Adverse events in patients with severe, refractory or fulminant CDI: there was weak evidence which suggested there was no increased risk associated with FMT for these types of patients.…”
Section: Guidelinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…FMT restores the diversity of the intestinal microbial compositions to create an ecologic competition between organisms to overcome and treat C. difficile overgrowth. Success rates of nearly 90% have been reported in most studies in patients with recurrent/refractory CDI (Table 1) [24][25][26][27][28]. Restoration of the normal intestinal microbial composition may also successfully eradicate colonization by multidrug resistant organisms such as extendedspectrum beta-lactamase-producing (ESBL) Escherichia coli (E. coli) [29], vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) [30], and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) [30].…”
Section: Biologic Consequences Of Fmtmentioning
confidence: 99%