Fecal source identification using random forest

Abstract

BackgroundClostridiales and Bacteroidales are uniquely adapted to the gut environment and have co-evolved with their hosts resulting in convergent microbiome patterns within mammalian species. As a result, members of Clostridiales and Bacteroidales are particularly suitable for identifying sources of fecal contamination in environmental samples. However, a comprehensive evaluation of their predictive power and development of computational approaches is lacking. Given the global public health concern for waterborne disease, accurate identification of fecal pollution sources is essential for effective risk assessment and management. Here, we use random forest algorithm and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequences assigned to Clostridiales and Bacteroidales to identify common fecal pollution sources. We benchmarked the accuracy, consistency, and sensitivity of our classification approach using fecal, environmental, and artificial in silico generated samples.ResultsClostridiales and Bacteroidales classifiers were composed mainly of sequences that displayed differential distributions (host-preferred) among sewage, cow, deer, pig, cat, and dog sources. Each classifier correctly identified human and individual animal sources in approximately 90% of the fecal and environmental samples tested. Misclassifications resulted mostly from false-positive identification of cat and dog fecal signatures in host animals not used to build the classifiers, suggesting characterization of additional animals would improve accuracy. Random forest predictions were highly reproducible, reflecting the consistency of the bacterial signatures within each of the animal and sewage sources. Using in silico generated samples, we could detect fecal bacterial signatures when the source dataset accounted for as little as ~ 0.5% of the assemblage, with ~ 0.04% of the sequences matching the classifiers. Finally, we developed a proxy to estimate proportions among sources, which allowed us to determine which sources contribute the most to observed fecal pollution.ConclusionRandom forest classification with 16S rRNA gene amplicons offers a rapid, sensitive, and accurate solution for identifying host microbial signatures to detect human and animal fecal contamination in environmental samples.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s40168-018-0568-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Disordered intestinal microbes are associated with the activity of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

“…We used spearman algorithm to analyze the relationship among microbiota, predicted pathways and SLE activity index. The Random Forest models were trained by "randomForest" package with default parameters in R, then the performance of the model was assessed with a ten-fold cross-validation approach and measured by area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) (33). All tests were performed using GraphPad Prism (v6.0) (GraphPad Software, Inc., CA, USA), SPSS Statistics (V.24.0.0.0) (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA) or R software (Version 3.4.4).…”

Highly Specific Sewage-Derived Bacteroides Quantitative PCR Assays Target Sewage-Polluted Waters

“…Computational or machine learning approaches such as Source Tracker (53) or random forest (54) can use sequence abundance patterns of the whole community, or of taxonomic groups, to identify pollution signals within a water sample. These methods rely on signatures of sequences that include their relative abundance patterns within the community, and sequences shared between sources generally do not also share overall relative abundance patterns within the signature (54). Furthermore, fecal bacterium sequences within these data sets that do not match a characterized source could be used to indicate extraneous sources that may be contributing fecal indicator bacteria but are not considered a significant human health risk (i.e., bird or pet waste and urban wildlife).…”

Peer Review #3 of "Visual complexity modelling based on image features fusion of multiple kernels (v0.3)"

“…Machine learning is widely used in several completely different fields; detection of regions of interests, image editing, texture analysis, visual aesthetic and quality assessment (Datta et al, 2006;Marchesotti et al, 2011;Romero et al, 2012;Fernandez-Lozano et al, 2015;Mata et al, 2018) and more recently in Carballal et al (2019b) or for microbiome analysis (Liu et al, 2017;Roguet et al, 2018), authentication of tequilas (Pérez-Caballero et al, 2017;Andrade et al, 2017), pathogenic point mutations (Rogers et al, 2018) or forensic identification (Gómez et al, 2018). Finally, with regard to the extraction of characteristics from images, some recently published works have been revised (Xu et al, 2018;Ali et al, 2016b;Wang et al, 2018;Sun et al, 2018;Zafar et al, 2018b).…”