1992
DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(92)91435-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fecal weight, colon cancer risk, and dietary intake of nonstarch polysaccharides (dietary fiber)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
221
3
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 428 publications
(237 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
11
221
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 4 also compared associations between faecal parameters and fermentation-dependent products, including total SCFA, butyrate, ammonia, branched SCFA and phenols. These associations again con®rm observations made by others (Burkitt et al, 1972;Cummings et al, 1992;Phillips et al, 1995;Birkett et al, 1996). Only faecal weight and transit time were signi®cantly correlated with concentrations of total SCFA and butyrate in the faeces.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 4 also compared associations between faecal parameters and fermentation-dependent products, including total SCFA, butyrate, ammonia, branched SCFA and phenols. These associations again con®rm observations made by others (Burkitt et al, 1972;Cummings et al, 1992;Phillips et al, 1995;Birkett et al, 1996). Only faecal weight and transit time were signi®cantly correlated with concentrations of total SCFA and butyrate in the faeces.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…There were also signi®cant correlations between faecal RS and faecal wet weight and reduced transit time (Table 4). As others have observed (Burkitt et al, 1972;Cummings et al, 1992) the increased faecal weight signi®cantly correlated with a faster transit time (Table 4). The only faecal parameter measured during this study to correlate signi®-cantly with faecal pH was slower transit time (Table 4).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…It has repeatedly been demonstrated that dietary fibre is effective in reducing transit time through the gut and in increasing stool bulk (Burkitt et al, 1972;Cummings et al, 1992). In the present study the total average intake of dietary fibre between the dietary groups varied between 35.5 and 42.0 g dietary fibre/day (results not shown), but no significant differences were found between the dietary groups with respect to mean transit time.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…A reduced transit time may be responsible for the increase in the faecal moisture content, but the method used was not sensitive enough to detect small changes in intestinal transit time. A decrease in intestinal transit time has been recognised as preventing constipation and being protective with respect to colon cancer risk owing to an enhancement of the clearance of toxic compounds (Cummings et al, 1992).…”
Section: Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%