were about 20%. thinner than those from control ducks, and shells of eggs from ducks fed 10 ppm of dieldrin were about 6% thinner than those from controls. The reduction in eggshell thickness was linear with increasing dose of DDT to 40 ppm, and with increasing dose of dieldrin through all levels studies. Eggshell thinning occurred regardless of whether the diets containing DDT were fed under ad libitum or controlled conditions. DDT fed at 200 ppm was lethal to the ducks. Neither DDT nor dieldrin affected weight of the eggs or rate of egg production. Heath et al. (1969b) first provided experimental evidence that DDT [1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethane] and DDE [1,t-dichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethylene] caused eggshell thinning in mallard ducks (Anas platyrhynchos). In their experiments, shells of eggs from ducks fed diets containing 25 ppm of DDT or 40 ppm of DDE were about 14 percent thinner than shells of control eggs. Subsequently, Tucker and Haegele (1970) observed that shells of eggs from mallards fed 30 ppm of DDT were 4.9 percent thinner than those of control eggs, and Longcore et al. (1971) observed that shells of eggs from black ducks Olnas rubripes) fed 30 ppm of DDE were 23.5 percent thinner at the equator than those of control eggs. Dieldrin (1,2,3,4,10,10-hexachloro-6,7-ep oxy-1,4,4a, 5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-l,4-endo-exo-5,8-dimethanonaphthalene) fed at four ppm (Muller and Lockman 1972) and ten ppm (Lehner and Egbert 1969) of the diet has also been shown to thin shells of eggs from mallards by about four percent. Smith et al. (1970) observed an 11 percent decrease in shell thickness of eggs from chickens fed ten ppm of DDT.