A Research Agenda for Federalism Studies 2019
DOI: 10.4337/9781788112970.00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Federalism and political theory: a case of mutual neglect?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, covenanting and the biblical cases are understudied in political theory generally and may merit close attention for that reason. The same can be said for federalism as a subject within political theory, which doubly makes the case for taking covenanting, including the biblical case, seriously (Hueglin 2019).…”
Section: How To Structure and Teach Covenantmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, covenanting and the biblical cases are understudied in political theory generally and may merit close attention for that reason. The same can be said for federalism as a subject within political theory, which doubly makes the case for taking covenanting, including the biblical case, seriously (Hueglin 2019).…”
Section: How To Structure and Teach Covenantmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, federalism and subsidiarity are sometimes posited as rival principles for allocating authority (e.g., Barber, 2018). Many similar debate whether federalism is consistent with or a rival to democracy (compare Kelemen, 2006; Hueglin, 2019; Abizadeh, 2021). These are good‐faith debates.…”
Section: Conceptual Desideratamentioning
confidence: 99%
“… This distinction builds on Hueglin (2019)'s call to examine federalism on its own terms. Per Hueglin, one must resolve questions about the relationship between federalism and democracy by attending to federalism's basic features.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 4. In the United States, moreover, there is no guarantee that states will be more progressive. For discussions of cases where states are resistant to furthering justice in various spaces, see for example (Battle 1980; D. King 2017; Colbern and Karthick Ramakrishnan 2020, especially chapter 4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%