2022
DOI: 10.1111/phc3.12820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Federalism: Contemporary political philosophy issues

Abstract: Federalism has important implications for basic philosophical concepts, including authority and distributive justice. Philosophers played key roles in the development of federalism as a(n at least purportedly) normative doctrine. However, federalism remains peripheral in contemporary political philosophy, leading to periodic calls for renewed scrutiny. This article identifies questions that any complete philosophical account of federalism should aim to answer and provides an overview of some dominant responses… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, partly due to empirical developments, the dominant account outside philosophy now holds that federalism is a normative doctrine promoting a secure political organization combining “shared[‐]rule and self‐rule” and separates this federal “idea” from institutional forms that may realize it (Elazar, 1987; Watts, 2008). Philosophers often begin by accepting this ideological approach (as I discuss further in Da Silva, 2022). 5 Popelier (2021, p. 33) even suggests “all” scholars view this combination as federalism's “normative core.” But philosophical strictures and practical realities demand a more circumscribed approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Yet, partly due to empirical developments, the dominant account outside philosophy now holds that federalism is a normative doctrine promoting a secure political organization combining “shared[‐]rule and self‐rule” and separates this federal “idea” from institutional forms that may realize it (Elazar, 1987; Watts, 2008). Philosophers often begin by accepting this ideological approach (as I discuss further in Da Silva, 2022). 5 Popelier (2021, p. 33) even suggests “all” scholars view this combination as federalism's “normative core.” But philosophical strictures and practical realities demand a more circumscribed approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I use this language in Da Silva 2022. I have since noticed that my schematic discussion there echoes King (1982).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation