2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-87199-4_31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Federated Semi-supervised Medical Image Classification via Inter-client Relation Matching

Abstract: Federated learning (FL) has emerged with increasing popularity to collaborate distributed medical institutions for training deep networks. However, despite existing FL algorithms only allow the supervised training setting, most hospitals in realistic usually cannot afford the intricate data labeling due to absence of budget or expertise. This paper studies a practical yet challenging FL problem, named Federated Semi-supervised Learning (FSSL), which aims to learn a federated model by jointly utilizing the data… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[36] proposed an adaptive layer-wise parameter selection method for uploading models for aggregation. Other works that also achieve competitive performance on benchmark datasets include [37]- [39]. [37] adapted a combination of two stateof-the-art semi-supervised methods, FixMatch [17] and Mix-Match [19], in a federated setting.…”
Section: B Federated Learning With Unlabeled Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[36] proposed an adaptive layer-wise parameter selection method for uploading models for aggregation. Other works that also achieve competitive performance on benchmark datasets include [37]- [39]. [37] adapted a combination of two stateof-the-art semi-supervised methods, FixMatch [17] and Mix-Match [19], in a federated setting.…”
Section: B Federated Learning With Unlabeled Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[37] adapted a combination of two stateof-the-art semi-supervised methods, FixMatch [17] and Mix-Match [19], in a federated setting. [38] and [39] proposed methods based on contrastive learning and knowledge distillation, respectively. Apart from classification, FSSL has been also used for the task of COVID-19 region segmentation in chest computed tomography scans [40].…”
Section: B Federated Learning With Unlabeled Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a standard federated learning setting, not every local client has access to pixel-level supervision for image segmentation to facilitate model learning with weakly-labeled and unlabeled training data. To this end, some semi-supervised federated learning approaches require clients to share supplementary information, e.g., client-specific disease relationship [32], extracted features from raw data [34], metadata of the training data [35], and ensemble predictions from different clients' locally-updated models besides their parameters [33]. Additional information sharing beyond the locally-updated model parameters may leak privacy-sensitive information [45] about clients' data.…”
Section: Semi-supervised Federated Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In detail, the authors used two different data augmentation methods to transform the unlabeled data, and supervised the strongly augmented samples with sharpened low-entropy prediction on the weakly augmented samples. Since the semi-supervised learning problem also exists in the FL scenario, some current studies [13], [32] and [33] investigated to construct SSL framework for FL based applications. As an instance, Jeong et al in [13] presented an inter-client consistency loss and a disjoint learning pattern on labeled and unlabeled data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%