“Fee earner vs fee burner”: internal divides in law firms

Abstract

Purpose: This article aims to explore and define the implications of the predominant divide in law firms between fee earners, i.e. lawyers contributing to law firm revenue, and support staff, i.e. employees in back office functions not directly contributing to revenue. To identify steps to improve retention rates among support staff. Design/methodology/approach: A survey was delivered to support staff across four law firms among the top ten UK law firms, out of which 154 valid responses were collected. For the analysis, responses were clustered to identify emerging themes. Additional interviews were also conducted with the aim to clarify emerging themes and deepen understanding of the issues raised. Findings: “You are either a fee earner or a fee burner” sums up the prevailing attitude support staff experiences in law firms. Throughout the responses – regardless of topic – the divide kept resurfacing again and again. In order to retain and motivate talented support staff, law firms will need to revisit their management of support staff and rethink the management of attitude towards them. Research limitations: Law firms are just one professional services sector under increasing competitive pressure, other professional service firms with similar structures, such as consulting or accounting firms have not been included in this research. Practical implications: While support staff ensures the delivery of business critical services in law firms, they are often seen as a disposable cost rather than a business relevant part of the organisation, which leads to frustration and low working morale. Several measures are suggested in this paper to address the management of support staff. Originality/value: This paper addresses an important gap in our knowledge of law firms and legal profession more generally: The work and working conditions of non‐fee earning staff

Changing professional service archetypes in a law firm using Process Orientated Holonic (PrOH) Modelling

“…"fee burners") was seen as a barrier to systemic management improvement, as in other law firms (Forstenlechner et al, 2009) due to different personal characteristics, career structures and performance metrics; and so the use of cross-functional teams made a significant contribution to this research process by enabling cross-discipline knowledge sharing, development of trust, and melding of spatial organizational barriers (Love & Roper, 2009). In this study the cross-functional action-research teams were composed of employees from different relevant legal services and different business support departments -who were empowered to work autonomously with support from their departmental heads.…”

Improving professional service operations: action research in a law firm

“…Engaging people to take part in firm-wide initiatives is a law-firm challenge. There is a perennial divide between fee-earning staff and the non-fee earning staff, in other words “ fee earners versus fee burners ” (Forstenlechner et al , 2009), which must be addressed to deliver change.…”