1990
DOI: 10.1002/etc.5620090112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feed aversion in small mammals as a potential source of hazard reduction for environmental chemicals: Agrichemical case studies

Abstract: Behavioral responses to environmental chemicals take various forms that may influence the hazard associated with chemical exposures in the field. From integrated laboratory‐field studies that addressed the wildlife hazard associated with two chemicals—paraquat and carbofuran—commonly applied in various agricultural practices, the role of behavioral responses to environmental toxicants may be illustrated. For small mammals, and in particular the cricetid and murid rodents, olfactory and gustatory cues are promi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2), due to the rapid rate of decline, which was similar to that of a previous study [39]. The acute oral LD5O of carbofuran for the meadow vole is 12 mg/kg body weight [40]. A vole weighing 27 g [41] would have to eat 16 g of vegetation containing 20 pg/g, the highest concentration found in our study areas (Fig.…”
Section: Potential Effects On Wildlifesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…2), due to the rapid rate of decline, which was similar to that of a previous study [39]. The acute oral LD5O of carbofuran for the meadow vole is 12 mg/kg body weight [40]. A vole weighing 27 g [41] would have to eat 16 g of vegetation containing 20 pg/g, the highest concentration found in our study areas (Fig.…”
Section: Potential Effects On Wildlifesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Avoidance behavior can be triggered by internal receptors within the context of chemotaxis and the resulting behavioral avoidance leads to decreased contact with the toxicant and therefore to decreased external exposure. Avoidance behavior has been shown for invertebrates avoiding contaminated sediment (De Lange et al 2006), soil (Natal-da-Luz et al 2008, or water (Schulz and Liess 2001); for fish, such as zebrafish avoiding Cu and acid mining drainage (Moreira-Santos et al 2008); and for mammals and birds through avoidance of contaminated food (Linder and Richmond 1990).…”
Section: Food Choicementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Ataxia and neuromotor dysfunction that characterize OP intoxication (O'Brien 1967:56) may reduce the foraging capability of intoxicated animals, thereby retarding growth. Feed aversion, but not anorexia, has been demonstrated in mammals exposed to pesticides (Linder and Richmond 1990). Gray-tailed voles can detect and avoid food contaminated with azinphos-methyl at concentrations as low as 100 g/g (T. Manning and J. O. Wolff, unpublished data).…”
Section: Insecticide Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, OPs can cross the placental barrier (Ackermann and Engst 1970) and are excreted in milk (Mosha et al 1991), resulting in direct fetal and neonatal toxicity (Fish 1966, Budreau and Singh 1973, Short et al 1980. Finally, physiological stress on female mammals, due to direct toxicity or feed aversion, can cause repro-ductive delay, embryo resorption, or stillbirth (Linder andRichmond 1990, Dost 1991). However, the potential of OPs to affect mammalian reproduction has not been confirmed by other field studies (Jackson 1952, Montz et al 1984, Carey 1993.…”
Section: Insecticide Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%