2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.04.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feed-in tariffs with minimum price guarantees and regulatory uncertainty

Abstract: The feed-in tariff (FIT) program is a popular policy for incentivizing new renewable energy projects because it establishes a long-term contract with renewable energy investors. This paper presents a novel model to analyze a FIT contract with a minimum price guarantee (i.e., a price-floor regime) from an investor's perspective. The results show that a perpetual guarantee only induces investment for prices below the price floor when offering a risk-free investment opportunity. In contrast, the finite guarantee … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies have been done that support this assertion; they are Yang and Ge ( 2018 ), who contended FiTs are effective and reasonable to the deployment of distributed photovoltaic in China and should be amended regularly to reflect market dynamics. In addition, Barbosa et al ( 2018 ) asserted that FiTs with a minimum guaranteed price would attract investment even if revenue is less than the actual investment when a risk-free investment is being offered. Zhao et al ( 2020 ) in their paper, delving into the effectiveness of wind power policy in China, found price policy and two non-price policy to have significant effects on the deployment of wind energy in China, of which price is vitally important to the deployment of wind in China.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have been done that support this assertion; they are Yang and Ge ( 2018 ), who contended FiTs are effective and reasonable to the deployment of distributed photovoltaic in China and should be amended regularly to reflect market dynamics. In addition, Barbosa et al ( 2018 ) asserted that FiTs with a minimum guaranteed price would attract investment even if revenue is less than the actual investment when a risk-free investment is being offered. Zhao et al ( 2020 ) in their paper, delving into the effectiveness of wind power policy in China, found price policy and two non-price policy to have significant effects on the deployment of wind energy in China, of which price is vitally important to the deployment of wind in China.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poisson processes are also considered jump processes because the realization of an event causes a discontinuity in the sample path. They have been observed to model price floor rates [28], policy interventions, technology innovations [109], and the arrival of new information related to the project [101] Combinations of GBM, mean-reverting, and jump processes are also found in the literature. These jump-diffusion processes explain the evolution of the SoU more generally.…”
Section: Jump Processes: Markov and Poisson Modelsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Now, we build on the work from Barbosa et al (2018) in order to find the value of project, the value of the option, and the investment trigger.…”
Section: Fit With a Minimum Price Guaranteementioning
confidence: 99%