1973
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(73)85202-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feed Utilization and Anatomical Adaptation of Kids after Removal of Compartments of Forestomach or Omasal Laminae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, outliers exist with particularly small omasa, such as the oribi (Hofmann, ) and the blackbuck (Sauer, Bertelsen, Hammer, et al, ), and the tragulids completely lack an omasum (Langer, ). Additionally, the fact that specimens of domestic ruminants whose omasum was partially surgically removed or circumvented can survive (Hamada, ; Trautmann & Schmitt, ) proves that a functional omasum is not an obligatory necessity for a ruminant organism, even if the low number of species with no or exceptionally small omasa—and the historical decline in tragulids in the fossil record (Clauss & Rössner, )—allows a narrative where a functional omasum represents a certain evolutionary advantage. Whether the particularly large omasa of Bovini represent an additional escalation (sensu Vermeij, ), with a morphophysiology tuned to maximizing the effects of digesta washing by an exceptionally high fluid throughput through the forestomach (as hypothesized by Clauss, Hume, & Hummel, ), remains to be fully explored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, outliers exist with particularly small omasa, such as the oribi (Hofmann, ) and the blackbuck (Sauer, Bertelsen, Hammer, et al, ), and the tragulids completely lack an omasum (Langer, ). Additionally, the fact that specimens of domestic ruminants whose omasum was partially surgically removed or circumvented can survive (Hamada, ; Trautmann & Schmitt, ) proves that a functional omasum is not an obligatory necessity for a ruminant organism, even if the low number of species with no or exceptionally small omasa—and the historical decline in tragulids in the fossil record (Clauss & Rössner, )—allows a narrative where a functional omasum represents a certain evolutionary advantage. Whether the particularly large omasa of Bovini represent an additional escalation (sensu Vermeij, ), with a morphophysiology tuned to maximizing the effects of digesta washing by an exceptionally high fluid throughput through the forestomach (as hypothesized by Clauss, Hume, & Hummel, ), remains to be fully explored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%