2011
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.208199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feedback and feedforward sympathetic haemodynamic control: chicken or egg?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, previous studies have largely been based on spontaneous indices of BRS, whereas our study derived BRS from experimentally driven oscillations of SAP at specific frequencies. Spontaneous assessment of BRS at the breathing frequency is controversial (9,19,20), and it remains unclear whether BP and R-R interval fluctuations coincident with respiration are linked by the baroreflex or arise from a central neural mechanism (4,20,26). Second, when spontaneous methods are conducted at the breathing frequency, it is not possible to uncouple the effects of breathing rate on BRS from the effects of BP oscillation frequency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, previous studies have largely been based on spontaneous indices of BRS, whereas our study derived BRS from experimentally driven oscillations of SAP at specific frequencies. Spontaneous assessment of BRS at the breathing frequency is controversial (9,19,20), and it remains unclear whether BP and R-R interval fluctuations coincident with respiration are linked by the baroreflex or arise from a central neural mechanism (4,20,26). Second, when spontaneous methods are conducted at the breathing frequency, it is not possible to uncouple the effects of breathing rate on BRS from the effects of BP oscillation frequency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positional compensation is consequently best achieved by interplay between both mechanisms. Because feedback mechanisms are by nature reactive, feed‐forward mechanisms may take the lead in shaping HR and BP at rest (Silvani et al 2008; Kamiya et al 2011; Tan & Taylor, 2011). The vestibular system may be particularly well suited for such a role because its nuclei routinely receive input from so many sensors – motion, somatosensory, proprioceptive and graviceptive (Yates et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, Seq and BER contained information on the influence of respiration on blood pressure, whilst the other methods were less sensitive. It remains unclear whether blood pressure and beat-to-beat interval fluctuations coinciding with respiration are of baroreflex origin or arise from another central neural mechanism (Diaz and Taylor, 2006;Tan and Taylor, 2011). Without controlled respiratory rate (with a metronome for example) disentangling the effects of respiratory rate on BRS from the effects of blood pressure oscillation frequency is very difficult if not impossible (Goldstein et al, 1982;Pagani et al, 1988;La Rovere et al, 2008;Bourdillon et al, 2018).…”
Section: Influence Of the Respiratory Rate On Brs Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%