2005
DOI: 10.1002/cne.20570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feedback connections to ferret striate cortex: Direct evidence for visuotopic convergence of feedback inputs

Abstract: Interareal feedback connections are a fundamental aspect of cortical architecture, yet many aspects of their organization and functional relevance remain poorly understood. Previous studies have investigated the topography of feedback projections from extrastriate cortex to macaque area 17. We have extended this analysis to the ferret. We made restricted injections of cholera toxin B (CTb) into ferret area 17 and mapped the distribution of retrogradely labeled cells in extrastriate cortex. In addition to exten… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
48
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(114 reference statements)
9
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The feed-forward connectivity was modeled to give a receptive field of b7 for 17/18 area neurons and 12°or 15°in 19/21 area neurons. These receptive field sizes are in accordance with the values for the center of the visual field reported by Manger et al (2002) and Cantone et al (2005) for the 19/21 area neurons. For a stimulus presented in the center of the field of view, the receptive field size in area 17/18 is twice the reported value, but a receptive field size at the 17/18 border at 5°eccentricity would be in accordance with published values (Manger et al, 2002;Cantone et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The feed-forward connectivity was modeled to give a receptive field of b7 for 17/18 area neurons and 12°or 15°in 19/21 area neurons. These receptive field sizes are in accordance with the values for the center of the visual field reported by Manger et al (2002) and Cantone et al (2005) for the 19/21 area neurons. For a stimulus presented in the center of the field of view, the receptive field size in area 17/18 is twice the reported value, but a receptive field size at the 17/18 border at 5°eccentricity would be in accordance with published values (Manger et al, 2002;Cantone et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The larger receptive fields imply that even small objects flashed as much as 7 degrees apart may, in areas 19 and 21, induce neurons in between the mapping sites to fire. As the areas 19 and 21 have retinotopically ordered feedback axons to areas 18 and 17 (Cantone et al, 2005(Cantone et al, , 2006, the firing of the 19/21 neurons initiated by the offset of the first object can be transmitted as a feedback to area 17/18.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Receptive field sizes and visual field representation vary among the cortical areas that project to auditory cortex (Law et al 1988;Manger et al 2002Manger et al , 2004Cantone et al 2005). In a limited number of recordings, we mapped the spatial extent of the visual receptive fields and found, in most cases, that these were broadly tuned to regions of space within the anterior contralateral quadrant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…One possibility is that the FBW may be produced by synaptic input to the dendrites in areas 21, 19, 18, and 17 from long-range feedback axons connecting area 21 with area 17 (27). Alternatively, spiking neurons in temporal and parietal lobe visual areas, by their long-range feedback axons, make multiple excitatory synapses in areas 21, 19, 18, and 17 produce the FBW.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Fbw As Opposed To Other Depolarizatiomentioning
confidence: 99%