2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2004.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feedback error learning and nonlinear adaptive control

Abstract: In this paper, we present our theoretical investigations of the technique of feedback error learning (FEL) from the viewpoint of adaptive control. We first discuss the relationship between FEL and nonlinear adaptive control with adaptive feedback linearization, and show that FEL can be interpreted as a form of nonlinear adaptive control. Second, we present a Lyapunov analysis suggesting that the condition of strictly positive realness (SPR) associated with the tracking error dynamics is a sufficient condition … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
84
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The input and output data sets are generated from closed-loop control that is feedback controller (PID) to train the neural network [30][31][32][33]. In this section, the generated data for network training, which are the same as the forward model, consist of nominal and plant uncertainty cases ( -30% of U, +30% of Hcrys, -30% of Hevap, +30% of kg and +30% of kp).…”
Section: Neural Network Inverse Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The input and output data sets are generated from closed-loop control that is feedback controller (PID) to train the neural network [30][31][32][33]. In this section, the generated data for network training, which are the same as the forward model, consist of nominal and plant uncertainty cases ( -30% of U, +30% of Hcrys, -30% of Hevap, +30% of kg and +30% of kp).…”
Section: Neural Network Inverse Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The convergence property of the FEL scheme was shown ( Gomi &Kawato 1993; Nakanishi & Schaal 2004). The FEL model has been developed in detail as a specific neural circuit model for three different regions of the cerebellum and the learning of the corresponding representative movements: 1) the flocculus and adaptive modification of the vestibuloocular reflex and optokinetic eye movement responses, 2) the vermis and adaptive posture control, and 3) the intermediate zones of the hemisphere and adaptive control of locomotion.…”
Section: Cerebellar Cortexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these studies, feedforward neural networks were used to model the complex inverse dynamics of the manipulator, and feedback error learning [11,13] was employed to train the networks. However, as the structure of PAM-driven robots gets more complex, expressing its dynamics in the form of a static mapping is becoming difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%