Proceedings of 1994 IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN'94) 1994
DOI: 10.1109/icnn.1994.374158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feedback-error learning scheme using recurrent neural networks for nonlinear dynamic systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different from the former self-balancing robot mentioned above, CCWR has two different operation modes, and the parameters in two modes are different. Fixed parameters control strategies such as fuzzy control [10,13,14], state feedback [15,16], PID control [17] and sliding mode [18,19], neural network [20]etc can hardly adapt to the overall change in system parameters. Therefore, changeable parameters controller is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different from the former self-balancing robot mentioned above, CCWR has two different operation modes, and the parameters in two modes are different. Fixed parameters control strategies such as fuzzy control [10,13,14], state feedback [15,16], PID control [17] and sliding mode [18,19], neural network [20]etc can hardly adapt to the overall change in system parameters. Therefore, changeable parameters controller is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20) Linearize the above nonlinear model around the balance point of T §0, sinT §0, cosT §1, equations(19) and (20has two operating modes and parameters are different in different modes, so equation (21) ~ (22) is not unique in different mode. For CCWR, its basic parameters are fixed and shown in…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Shibata and Schaal later applied the FEL to a humanoid robot face to emulate the VOR using a recursive least squares training law. 27 Some current investigations focus on using different feedback learning algorithms to optimize the process, 28 testing different network structures, 29 and applying the FEL model to adaptive control. 30 The natural progression is to integrate forward Smith predictor model with the learned internal model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FEL model applied the FEL to a humanoid robot face to emulate the VOR using a recursive least squares training law [51]. Some current investigations focus on using different feedback learning algorithms to optimize the process [52], testing different network structures [53] and applying the FEL model to adaptive control [54].…”
Section: Cerebellum and Vormentioning
confidence: 99%