2010
DOI: 10.2478/v10143-010-0020-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feedback in the Concept Map Based Intelligent Knowledge Assessment System

Abstract: -The paper presents the concept map based intelligent knowledge assessment system developed by the Department of Systems Theory and Design of the Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology of Riga Technical University. The main attention is devoted to the implementation of various kinds of feedback intended for promotion of effective learning and informing of a teacher about students' progress. The feedback is considered from three points of view: feedback generated automatically by the system and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most directive automated guidance for concept mapping activities in prior research was more specific and corrective than the directive guidance used in this study. For instance, they often pointed out inaccurate connections (e.g., Person et al, ), highlighted discrepancies between student‐generated and expert maps (e.g., Lukasenko et al, ), and presented specific data on student performance, such as a number of accurate and inaccurate concepts, propositions, and relationships (e.g., Gouli et al, ). Compared to these studies, the directive automated guidance used in this study provided conceptual information without explicitly pointing out which connections were accurate or which icons should be modified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most directive automated guidance for concept mapping activities in prior research was more specific and corrective than the directive guidance used in this study. For instance, they often pointed out inaccurate connections (e.g., Person et al, ), highlighted discrepancies between student‐generated and expert maps (e.g., Lukasenko et al, ), and presented specific data on student performance, such as a number of accurate and inaccurate concepts, propositions, and relationships (e.g., Gouli et al, ). Compared to these studies, the directive automated guidance used in this study provided conceptual information without explicitly pointing out which connections were accurate or which icons should be modified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even with open‐ended activities, such as creating concept maps, many studies provide directive guidance that detects which concepts are inaccurate or that informs students what should be revised in their maps (e.g., Attali & Powers, ; Gouli, Gogoulou, & Grigoriadou, ). For example, several concept mapping tools provided directive guidance providing overall scores, describing a number of correct concepts compared to a given expert map, or highlighting discrepancies between student‐generated and expert maps (Conlon, ; Luckie, Harrison, & Ebert‐May, ; Lukasenko, Anohina‐Naumeca, Vilkelis, & Grundspenkis, ; Person et al, ). These studies report that directive guidance is effective in reducing the number of errors students made, helping students fix their mistakes, and encouraging them to revise their responses (Anderson et al, ; Attali & Powers, ; Boramy, ; Koedinger & Aleven, ; Koedinger, McLaughlin, & Heffernan, ).…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although adaptive and automated elements are increasingly common in online learning environments (e.g., Aleven et al, 2010;Lukasenko et al, 2010;Vandewaetere et al, 2011;Gerard et al, 2015Gerard et al, , 2016, they have typically been designed and implemented for a single learning activity in a specific domain. The reason for this is simple; even adaptive guidance for a single well-defined learning task generally requires years of research and development.…”
Section: Adaptive and Automated Scaffoldingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system has twofold goals in the context of integration of technology into the traditional educational process [27]: a) to promote students' knowledge self-assessment, and b) to support teachers in improvement of study courses through systematic assessment and analysis of students' knowledge. Knowledge selfassessment is supported by the evaluation of students' concept maps and provision of informative and tutoring feedback.…”
Section: Overview Of Ikasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usage scenario of IKAS [27] assumes that a teacher divides a course into several assessment stages. A stage can be any logically completed part of the course, for example, a chapter.…”
Section: Overview Of Ikasmentioning
confidence: 99%