2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2009.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feedback-induced phase noise in microcantilever-based oscillators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…when there are other Admittances in parallel), leads to the misconception underlying the aforesaid PI of the pioneering works of Johnson [9] and Nyquist [10]. This error is so deep-rooted in today's research that reviewers of [3] were not ashamed of publishing a piling-up of electrical charge in a resistance devoid of capacitance C, which links electric charge and electric voltage 15 10…”
Section: Reviewing Current Model For Electrical Noise In Resistorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…when there are other Admittances in parallel), leads to the misconception underlying the aforesaid PI of the pioneering works of Johnson [9] and Nyquist [10]. This error is so deep-rooted in today's research that reviewers of [3] were not ashamed of publishing a piling-up of electrical charge in a resistance devoid of capacitance C, which links electric charge and electric voltage 15 10…”
Section: Reviewing Current Model For Electrical Noise In Resistorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To give some figures, the kT/C noise at room T (e.g. the square root of   or With feedback, however, the BW N doubles due to R 2 shunting the same C that this feedback in-phase with the output doesn't vary [15]. From this double BW N with the noise power on R is:…”
Section:  mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of this L can be seen as a feedback current that being proportional to the voltage v(t) on C, has -90˚ phase lag under sinusoidal regime (SR). This feedback in quadrature with v(t) that affects f 0 , leads to the feedback-induced phase noise that we showed for oscillators based on resonant microcantilevers in [5]. This Technical phase noise due to a deficient phase control of the feedback adds to the non technical, but Thermodynamical phase noise we will explain for oscillators with perfect loops where current feedback to the resonator is exactly in-phase with its voltage v(t) for Positive Feedback (PF) or exactly at 180˚ for Negative Feedback (NF).…”
Section: Because the Thermal Fluctuation 2 Ktmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…From the above it isn't difficult to realize that a narrow-band CF working synchronously with the carrier at frequency f 0 ≠ 0 will damp well the noise 2FkTR V 2 /Hz it sees in phase, whereas the noise 2FkTR V 2 /Hz it sees with phase error of -90˚ will mislead it so as to create the Pedestal of 2FkTR V 2 /Hz around f 0 shown in [1]. We have to say that this Pedestal of noise that will lead to a feedback-induced Pedestal of phase noise was not considered in [6] because it is not the random modulation of f 0 that we called Technical phase noise in [1].…”
Section: Dissipation and Feedback-induced Noise In An L-c-r Resonatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For R FB = R, this PF would compensate exactly the power lost at each instant in R, thus the power lost in R at any f. Although this exact compensation will fail at high f because the finite bandwidth BW FB of the feedback of Figure 4, it will work well at typical oscillation frequencies f 0 , provided a fast enough electronics is used. Given that the effects of any phase error in the loop due to the finite BW FB and its associated phase noise were shown in [6], we will consider this PF as perfectly in-phase at f 0 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%