2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feedback loop process to control acoustic cavitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, because the inertial cavitation dose saturation curve follows the microbubble cavitation‐induced bioeffect level, the inertial cavitation dose may provide implicit dosimetry of the bioeffects over a wide range of US parameters 22 . Such findings allowed the proposal of broadband noise measurements based on implicit dose metrics to regulate the inertial cavitation level through a real‐time feedback loop 32 . However, from a practical application point, it is complicated to use the inertial cavitation dose to visualize the sample parts exposed to insufficient inertial cavitation levels 9 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, because the inertial cavitation dose saturation curve follows the microbubble cavitation‐induced bioeffect level, the inertial cavitation dose may provide implicit dosimetry of the bioeffects over a wide range of US parameters 22 . Such findings allowed the proposal of broadband noise measurements based on implicit dose metrics to regulate the inertial cavitation level through a real‐time feedback loop 32 . However, from a practical application point, it is complicated to use the inertial cavitation dose to visualize the sample parts exposed to insufficient inertial cavitation levels 9 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once cavitation is initiated, the target CI = 8 in point C could easily jump to a higher cavitation state (point D) due to the metastable behaviour of the phenomenon. Following the upper branch by decreasing the applied acoustic intensity would result to come back to the target (point E), before repeating this process in the range of acoustic intensities lying between points A and C. This real-time modulation technique has been the basics of first feedback loop process to control cavitation activity in continuous [17] and pulsed [18] ultrasound sonication. Of interest is the fact that this hysteretic curve appears as the envelope of overall cavitation activity as a function of acoustic intensity used to demonstrate the variability of the process (see Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of interest is the fact that this hysteretic curve appears as the envelope of overall cavitation activity as a function of acoustic intensity used to demonstrate the variability of the process (see Fig. 4 of [17] for instance). As a consequence, this characteristic curve can be used as a calibration measurement in order to define the range of acoustic intensities in which a control process could be performed.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the injected microbubbles are exposed to an acoustic field, they not only reflect the sound, but also generate their own unique acoustic emissions, such as subharmonics (f0/m, where f0 is the fundamental frequency and m is an integer value), harmonics, ultra-harmonics (nf0/m, where n is also an integer value), and broadband signals. To improve the performance and safety of the therapeutic procedure, feedback control technologies based on detecting microbubble emissions have been developed [1][2][3][4][5]. The detection of subharmonics [6], harmonics [1] or ultra-harmonics [7] from microbubbles has been used to adjust the sonication pressure to produce safer and more effective treatments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%